PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUBX vs. XTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUBX vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUBX achieves a -48.88% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's 5.60% return.


QUBX

1D
-14.85%
1M
-44.16%
YTD
-48.88%
6M
-59.20%
1Y
-91.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTJL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.45%
YTD
5.60%
6M
5.27%
1Y
14.52%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUBX vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QUBX and XTJL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUBX vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUBX
QUBX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
QUBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUBX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QUBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUBX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUBX vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QUBXXTJLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.44

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

2.85

-3.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.20

16.13

-17.33

QUBX vs. XTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUBX Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the XTJL Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUBX and XTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QUBX vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUBX drawdown since its inception was -96.40%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBX and XTJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUBXXTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.40%

-23.24%

-73.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-96.40%

-5.12%

-91.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.79%

-0.06%

-93.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.76%

-3.99%

-66.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

75.78%

0.90%

+74.88%

Volatility

QUBX vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) has a higher volatility of 57.66% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 0.35%. This indicates that QUBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUBXXTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

57.66%

0.35%

+57.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

133.93%

5.63%

+128.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

200.88%

7.35%

+193.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

200.88%

15.13%

+185.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

200.88%

15.13%

+185.75%

QUBX vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

QUBX vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither QUBX nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QUBX and XTJL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QUBX has higher volatility (57.66%) compared to XTJL (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUBX dropped -96.40% vs XTJL's -23.24%.

On 1-year performance, XTJL leads with 14.52% vs -91.08% for QUBX. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XTJL has performed better with a 14.52% return vs -91.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QUBX.

QUBX and XTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QUBX and 0.79% for XTJL.

XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUBX and XTJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer