QUBX vs. VRTL
QUBX (Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF) and VRTL (GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Over the past year, QUBX returned -91.08% vs 303.87% for VRTL. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QUBX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for VRTL.
Performance
QUBX vs. VRTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUBX achieves a -48.88% return, which is significantly lower than VRTL's 185.71% return.
QUBX
- 1D
- -14.85%
- 1M
- -44.16%
- YTD
- -48.88%
- 6M
- -59.20%
- 1Y
- -91.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VRTL
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -12.00%
- YTD
- 185.71%
- 6M
- 167.27%
- 1Y
- 303.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUBX vs. VRTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QUBX Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF | -48.88% | -83.01% |
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF | 185.71% | 54.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUBX and VRTL is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUBX vs. VRTL — Risk / Return Rank
QUBX
VRTL
QUBX vs. VRTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUBX | VRTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.36 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 6.45 | -7.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 15.04 | -16.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUBX vs. VRTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUBX drawdown since its inception was -96.40%, which is greater than VRTL's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBX and VRTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUBX | VRTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.40% | -60.58% | -35.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.40% | -47.45% | -48.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.79% | -34.40% | -59.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.76% | -15.99% | -54.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 75.78% | 20.32% | +55.46% |
Volatility
QUBX vs. VRTL - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) has a higher volatility of 57.66% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) at 43.67%. This indicates that QUBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUBX | VRTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 57.66% | 43.67% | +13.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 133.93% | 92.00% | +41.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 200.88% | 119.79% | +81.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 200.88% | 126.68% | +74.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 200.88% | 126.68% | +74.20% |
QUBX vs. VRTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than VRTL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
QUBX vs. VRTL - Dividend Comparison
Neither QUBX nor VRTL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QUBX and VRTL have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QUBX has higher volatility (57.66%) compared to VRTL (43.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUBX dropped -96.40% vs VRTL's -60.58%.
On 1-year performance, VRTL leads with 303.87% vs -91.08% for QUBX. On fees, QUBX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. On volatility, VRTL has been the lower-risk option at 43.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VRTL has performed better with a 303.87% return vs -91.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUBX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.
QUBX and VRTL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QUBX and 1.50% for VRTL.
VRTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUBX and VRTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer