QUBX vs. TSLG

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

QUBX (Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF) and TSLG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Over the past year, QUBX returned -95.40% vs 3.16% for TSLG. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QUBX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TSLG.

Performance

QUBX vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUBX achieves a -68.82% return, which is significantly lower than TSLG's -39.27% return.

QUBX

• 1D: 4.11%
• 1M: -40.85%
• 6M: -78.72%
• YTD: -68.82%
• 1Y: -95.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TSLG

• 1D: -5.03%
• 1M: -10.87%
• 6M: -35.24%
• YTD: -39.27%
• 1Y: 3.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUBX vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QUBX Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF	-68.82%	-83.01%
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF	-39.27%	39.09%

Correlation

The correlation between QUBX and TSLG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	0.37

Return for Risk

QUBX vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUBX

QUBX Risk / Return Rank: 4
QUBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
QUBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
QUBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
QUBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
QUBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

TSLG

TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 13
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 16
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUBX vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QUBX	TSLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	0.04	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.92	0.70	-1.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.08	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	0.06	-1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.22	0.11	-1.33

QUBX vs. TSLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUBX Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the TSLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUBX and TSLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QUBX vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUBX drawdown since its inception was -96.40%, which is greater than TSLG's maximum drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBX and TSLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QUBX	TSLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.40%	-82.86%	-13.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.40%	-54.61%	-41.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.21%	-69.32%	-26.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.21%	-59.09%	-13.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	78.41%	29.02%	+49.39%

Volatility

QUBX vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) has a higher volatility of 44.53% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) at 33.88%. This indicates that QUBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QUBX	TSLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	44.53%	33.88%	+10.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	132.89%	62.70%	+70.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	198.84%	89.29%	+109.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	197.99%	115.18%	+82.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	197.99%	115.18%	+82.81%

QUBX vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

QUBX vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison

QUBX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.78%.

Position	TTM	2025
QUBX Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF	10.78%	6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QUBX and TSLG in my portfolio?

QUBX and TSLG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QUBX or TSLG?

QUBX has higher volatility (44.53%) compared to TSLG (33.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUBX dropped -96.40% vs TSLG's -82.86%.

Which ETF is better, QUBX or TSLG?

On 1-year performance, TSLG leads with 3.16% vs -95.40% for QUBX. On fees, TSLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TSLG has been the lower-risk option at 33.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QUBX or TSLG?

Over the 1-year period, TSLG has performed better with a 3.16% return vs -95.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QUBX or TSLG?

TSLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QUBX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QUBX or TSLG?

TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 10.78%, compared with 0.00% for QUBX.

What is the main difference between QUBX and TSLG?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QUBX and 0.75% for TSLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.