QUBX vs. SMU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QUBX (Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF) and SMU (Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.

Performance

QUBX vs. SMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) and Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUBX achieves a -25.88% return, which is significantly higher than SMU's -55.15% return.

QUBX

• 1D: -16.53%
• 1M: 20.88%
• YTD: -25.88%
• 6M: -51.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SMU

• 1D: -24.09%
• 1M: -8.19%
• YTD: -55.15%
• 6M: -79.54%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUBX vs. SMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QUBX Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF	-25.88%	-81.57%
SMU Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF	-55.15%	-92.36%

Correlation

The correlation between QUBX and SMU is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025	0.59

Return for Risk

QUBX vs. SMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) and Tradr 2X Long SMR Daily ETF (SMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QUBX	SMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.44	-0.48	+0.04

Drawdowns

QUBX vs. SMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUBX drawdown since its inception was -96.40%, roughly equal to the maximum SMU drawdown of -98.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBX and SMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	QUBX	SMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.40%	-98.68%	+2.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.00%	-98.10%	+7.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.71%	-75.88%	+6.17%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QUBX	SMU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	200.76%	204.10%	-3.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	200.76%	204.10%	-3.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	200.76%	204.10%	-3.34%

QUBX vs. SMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QUBX and SMU have an expense ratio of 1.30%.

Dividends

QUBX vs. SMU - Dividend Comparison

Neither QUBX nor SMU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QUBX and SMU in my portfolio?

QUBX and SMU have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QUBX or SMU?

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QUBX or SMU?

QUBX and SMU have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QUBX or SMU?

QUBX and SMU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.