QUBX vs. NBIG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QUBX (Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF) and NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QUBX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NBIG.

Performance

QUBX vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUBX achieves a -26.52% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 487.61% return.

QUBX

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 18.69%
• YTD: -26.52%
• 6M: -61.05%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NBIG

• 1D: 6.23%
• 1M: 96.57%
• YTD: 487.61%
• 6M: 268.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUBX vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QUBX Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF	-26.52%	-66.96%
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF	487.61%	-62.34%

Correlation

The correlation between QUBX and NBIG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.60

Return for Risk

QUBX vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QUBX	NBIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.44	1.38	-1.83

Drawdowns

QUBX vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUBX drawdown since its inception was -96.40%, which is greater than NBIG's maximum drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBX and NBIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QUBX	NBIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.40%	-75.83%	-20.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.08%	-3.94%	-87.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.80%	-42.82%	-26.98%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QUBX	NBIG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	200.33%	200.64%	-0.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	200.33%	200.64%	-0.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	200.33%	200.64%	-0.31%

QUBX vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

QUBX vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison

Neither QUBX nor NBIG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QUBX and NBIG in my portfolio?

QUBX and NBIG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QUBX or NBIG?

On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QUBX or NBIG?

NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QUBX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QUBX or NBIG?

QUBX and NBIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QUBX and NBIG?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QUBX and 0.75% for NBIG.