QUBX vs. MUU
QUBX (Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QUBX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.
Performance
QUBX vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QUBX
- 1D
- -14.85%
- 1M
- -44.16%
- YTD
- -48.88%
- 6M
- -59.20%
- 1Y
- -91.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUU
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUBX vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QUBX Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF | -26.11% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUBX and MUU is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUBX vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
QUBX
MUU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QUBX vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUBX | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUBX vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUBX drawdown since its inception was -96.40%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBX and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUBX | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.40% | -26.63% | -69.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.79% | -26.63% | -67.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.76% | -12.91% | -57.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 75.78% | — | — |
Volatility
QUBX vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUBX | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 57.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 133.93% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 200.88% | 263.57% | -62.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 200.88% | 263.57% | -62.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 200.88% | 263.57% | -62.69% |
QUBX vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
QUBX vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
QUBX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.23% |
QUBX Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QUBX and MUU have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QUBX.
MUU has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.00% for QUBX.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QUBX and 1.01% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for QUBX and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer