QUBX vs. LRCU

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

QUBX (Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF) and LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.

Performance

QUBX vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUBX achieves a -48.88% return, which is significantly lower than LRCU's 270.56% return.

QUBX

• 1D: -14.85%
• 1M: -44.16%
• YTD: -48.88%
• 6M: -59.20%
• 1Y: -91.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRCU

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 38.68%
• YTD: 270.56%
• 6M: 245.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUBX vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QUBX Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF	-48.88%	-75.77%
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	270.56%	172.36%

Correlation

The correlation between QUBX and LRCU is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025	0.32

Return for Risk

QUBX vs. LRCU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUBX

QUBX Risk / Return Rank: 4
QUBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
QUBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
QUBX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
QUBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
QUBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

LRCU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUBX vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QUBX	LRCU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.45	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.38	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.95	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.20	—	—

Drawdowns

QUBX vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUBX drawdown since its inception was -96.40%, which is greater than LRCU's maximum drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBX and LRCU.

Drawdown Indicators

	QUBX	LRCU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.40%	-40.09%	-56.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.79%	-18.44%	-75.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.76%	-9.29%	-61.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	75.78%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QUBX	LRCU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	57.66%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	133.93%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	200.88%	116.15%	+84.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	200.88%	116.15%	+84.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	200.88%	116.15%	+84.73%

QUBX vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QUBX and LRCU have an expense ratio of 1.30%.

Dividends

QUBX vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison

Neither QUBX nor LRCU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QUBX and LRCU in my portfolio?

QUBX and LRCU have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QUBX or LRCU?

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QUBX or LRCU?

QUBX and LRCU have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QUBX or LRCU?

QUBX and LRCU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.