QUBX vs. LITX
QUBX (Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF) and LITX (Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QUBX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for LITX.
Performance
QUBX vs. LITX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QUBX
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 18.69%
- YTD
- -26.52%
- 6M
- -61.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LITX
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -18.50%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUBX vs. LITX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QUBX Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF | -35.72% |
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF | 335.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUBX and LITX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2026 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUBX vs. LITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) and Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QUBX | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | 32.05 | -32.49 |
Drawdowns
QUBX vs. LITX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUBX drawdown since its inception was -96.40%, which is greater than LITX's maximum drawdown of -51.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBX and LITX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUBX | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.40% | -51.46% | -44.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.08% | -25.05% | -66.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.80% | -14.60% | -55.20% |
Volatility
QUBX vs. LITX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUBX | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 200.33% | 198.92% | +1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 200.33% | 198.92% | +1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 200.33% | 198.92% | +1.41% |
QUBX vs. LITX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LITX's 1.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
QUBX vs. LITX - Dividend Comparison
Neither QUBX nor LITX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QUBX and LITX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QUBX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QUBX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for LITX.
QUBX and LITX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QUBX and 1.49% for LITX.
Find the right allocation for QUBX and LITX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer