QUBX vs. ARCX
QUBX (Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF) and ARCX (Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Over the past year, QUBX returned -91.08% vs -88.43% for ARCX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.
Performance
QUBX vs. ARCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUBX achieves a -48.88% return, which is significantly higher than ARCX's -65.68% return.
QUBX
- 1D
- -14.85%
- 1M
- -44.16%
- YTD
- -48.88%
- 6M
- -59.20%
- 1Y
- -91.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARCX
- 1D
- -7.52%
- 1M
- -40.64%
- YTD
- -65.68%
- 6M
- -71.02%
- 1Y
- -88.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUBX vs. ARCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QUBX Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF | -48.88% | -83.01% |
ARCX Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF | -65.68% | -61.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUBX and ARCX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.66 |
The correlation between QUBX and ARCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUBX vs. ARCX — Risk / Return Rank
QUBX
ARCX
QUBX vs. ARCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) and Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUBX | ARCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.87 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | -0.96 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | -1.26 | +0.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUBX vs. ARCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUBX drawdown since its inception was -96.40%, roughly equal to the maximum ARCX drawdown of -92.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBX and ARCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUBX | ARCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.40% | -92.20% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.40% | -92.20% | -4.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.79% | -92.20% | -1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.76% | -65.58% | -5.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 75.78% | 70.00% | +5.78% |
Volatility
QUBX vs. ARCX - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) has a higher volatility of 57.66% compared to Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) at 45.74%. This indicates that QUBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUBX | ARCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 57.66% | 45.74% | +11.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 133.93% | 89.68% | +44.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 200.88% | 138.45% | +62.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 200.88% | 140.65% | +60.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 200.88% | 140.65% | +60.23% |
QUBX vs. ARCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QUBX and ARCX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.
Dividends
QUBX vs. ARCX - Dividend Comparison
Neither QUBX nor ARCX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QUBX and ARCX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QUBX has higher volatility (57.66%) compared to ARCX (45.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUBX dropped -96.40% vs ARCX's -92.20%.
On 1-year performance, ARCX leads with -88.43% vs -91.08% for QUBX. Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. On volatility, ARCX has been the lower-risk option at 45.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ARCX has performed better with a -88.43% return vs -91.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUBX and ARCX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.
QUBX and ARCX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
QUBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.45 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUBX and ARCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer