PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUBX vs. ARCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUBX vs. ARCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) and Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUBX achieves a -11.20% return, which is significantly higher than ARCX's -39.31% return.


QUBX

1D
-2.17%
1M
55.48%
YTD
-11.20%
6M
-29.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARCX

1D
-6.89%
1M
24.02%
YTD
-39.31%
6M
-52.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUBX vs. ARCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QUBX
Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF
-11.20%-82.54%
ARCX
Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF
-39.31%-66.30%

Correlation

The correlation between QUBX and ARCX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

0.65

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUBX vs. ARCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) and Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QUBX vs. ARCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QUBXARCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.43

-0.60

+0.17

Drawdowns

QUBX vs. ARCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUBX drawdown since its inception was -96.40%, which is greater than ARCX's maximum drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBX and ARCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUBXARCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.40%

-91.51%

-4.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.22%

-86.20%

-3.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.62%

-64.41%

-5.21%

Volatility

QUBX vs. ARCX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUBXARCXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

200.46%

138.76%

+61.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

200.46%

138.76%

+61.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

200.46%

138.76%

+61.70%

QUBX vs. ARCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QUBX and ARCX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.


Dividends

QUBX vs. ARCX - Dividend Comparison

Neither QUBX nor ARCX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QUBX and ARCX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QUBX and ARCX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

QUBX and ARCX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUBX and ARCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer