QUBX vs. AMUU

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

QUBX (Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF) and AMUU (Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Over the past year, QUBX returned -93.92% vs 565.82% for AMUU. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QUBX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for AMUU.

Performance

QUBX vs. AMUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) and Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUBX achieves a -66.67% return, which is significantly lower than AMUU's 334.39% return.

QUBX

• 1D: -6.06%
• 1M: -51.82%
• 6M: -76.81%
• YTD: -66.67%
• 1Y: -93.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMUU

• 1D: -6.65%
• 1M: -10.86%
• 6M: 304.30%
• YTD: 334.39%
• 1Y: 565.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUBX vs. AMUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QUBX Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF	-66.67%	-83.01%
AMUU Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares	334.39%	116.59%

Correlation

The correlation between QUBX and AMUU is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	0.30

Return for Risk

QUBX vs. AMUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUBX

QUBX Risk / Return Rank: 4
QUBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
QUBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
QUBX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
QUBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
QUBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

AMUU

AMUU Risk / Return Rank: 94
AMUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AMUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AMUU Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AMUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMUU Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUBX vs. AMUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) and Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QUBX	AMUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.47	4.17	-4.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.70	3.54	-4.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.45	-0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	10.14	-11.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.20	19.57	-20.78

QUBX vs. AMUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUBX Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the AMUU Sharpe Ratio of 4.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUBX and AMUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QUBX vs. AMUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUBX drawdown since its inception was -96.40%, which is greater than AMUU's maximum drawdown of -56.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBX and AMUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	QUBX	AMUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.40%	-56.47%	-39.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.40%	-56.31%	-40.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.95%	-18.55%	-77.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.03%	-22.07%	-49.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	77.94%	29.11%	+48.83%

Volatility

QUBX vs. AMUU - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) has a higher volatility of 52.86% compared to Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) at 43.85%. This indicates that QUBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QUBX	AMUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	52.86%	43.85%	+9.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	133.27%	106.30%	+26.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	199.16%	137.36%	+61.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	198.46%	133.77%	+64.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	198.46%	133.77%	+64.69%

QUBX vs. AMUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than AMUU's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

QUBX vs. AMUU - Dividend Comparison

QUBX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%.

Position	TTM	2025
AMUU Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares	3.46%	13.58%
QUBX Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QUBX and AMUU in my portfolio?

QUBX and AMUU have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QUBX or AMUU?

QUBX has higher volatility (52.86%) compared to AMUU (43.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUBX dropped -96.40% vs AMUU's -56.47%.

Which ETF is better, QUBX or AMUU?

On 1-year performance, AMUU leads with 565.82% vs -93.92% for QUBX. On fees, AMUU is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, AMUU has been the lower-risk option at 43.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QUBX or AMUU?

Over the 1-year period, AMUU has performed better with a 565.82% return vs -93.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QUBX or AMUU?

AMUU is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QUBX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QUBX or AMUU?

AMUU has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 0.00% for QUBX.

What is the main difference between QUBX and AMUU?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QUBX and 0.97% for AMUU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.17 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.