QUBT vs. VGSH
QUBT (Quantum Computing, Inc.) is a stock, while VGSH (Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Over the past 5 years, QUBT returned 11.82%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for VGSH. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
QUBT vs. VGSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUBT achieves a -11.40% return, which is significantly lower than VGSH's 0.64% return.
QUBT
- 1D
- -6.29%
- 1M
- -22.17%
- YTD
- -11.40%
- 6M
- -20.40%
- 1Y
- -45.70%
- 3Y*
- 90.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.82%
- 10Y*
- —
VGSH
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 3.03%
- 3Y*
- 4.24%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- 1.71%
QUBT vs. VGSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUBT Quantum Computing, Inc. | -11.40% | -38.01% | 1,712.51% | -39.53% | -55.72% | -75.83% | 370.33% | 0.00% | -42.31% |
VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF | 0.64% | 5.07% | 4.00% | 4.31% | -3.86% | -0.60% | 3.04% | 3.52% | 1.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUBT and VGSH is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2018 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUBT vs. VGSH — Risk / Return Rank
QUBT
VGSH
QUBT vs. VGSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUBT | VGSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.48 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 3.44 | -4.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | 13.16 | -14.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUBT vs. VGSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUBT drawdown since its inception was -97.53%, which is greater than VGSH's maximum drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBT and VGSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUBT | VGSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.53% | -5.70% | -91.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.37% | -0.88% | -73.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.40% | -0.97% | -81.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.63% | -5.66% | -89.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.60% | -0.14% | -64.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.85% | -0.60% | -72.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.66% | 0.23% | +49.43% |
Volatility
QUBT vs. VGSH - Volatility Comparison
Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) has a higher volatility of 29.19% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH) at 0.46%. This indicates that QUBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUBT | VGSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.19% | 0.46% | +28.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.34% | 0.96% | +66.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 101.35% | 1.31% | +100.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 133.31% | 1.98% | +131.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 177.27% | 1.58% | +175.69% |
Dividends
QUBT vs. VGSH - Dividend Comparison
QUBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUBT Quantum Computing, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF | 3.87% | 4.00% | 4.18% | 3.31% | 1.15% | 0.66% | 1.74% | 2.28% | 1.79% | 1.10% | 0.84% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QUBT and VGSH have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QUBT has higher volatility (29.19%) compared to VGSH (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUBT dropped -97.53% vs VGSH's -5.70%.
VGSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUBT and VGSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer