QUBT vs. SOUN
QUBT (Quantum Computing, Inc.) and SOUN (SoundHound AI, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — QUBT in Computer Hardware, SOUN in Software - Application. Over the past 3 years, QUBT returned 77.69%/yr vs 29.87%/yr for SOUN. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QUBT vs. SOUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUBT achieves a -3.22% return, which is significantly higher than SOUN's -30.79% return.
QUBT
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -9.97%
- YTD
- -3.22%
- 6M
- -17.59%
- 1Y
- -43.29%
- 3Y*
- 77.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.88%
- 10Y*
- —
SOUN
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- -18.05%
- YTD
- -30.79%
- 6M
- -40.77%
- 1Y
- -27.14%
- 3Y*
- 29.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUBT vs. SOUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUBT Quantum Computing, Inc. | -3.22% | -38.01% | 1,712.51% | -39.53% | -0.66% |
SOUN SoundHound AI, Inc. | -30.79% | -49.75% | 835.85% | 19.77% | -79.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUBT and SOUN is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022 | 0.40 |
The correlation between QUBT and SOUN shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
QUBT:
$2.22B
SOUN:
$2.34B
QUBT:
-$0.21
SOUN:
-$0.43
QUBT:
428.61
SOUN:
14.72
QUBT:
1.39
SOUN:
5.07
QUBT:
$4.33M
SOUN:
$183.99M
QUBT:
-$667.00K
SOUN:
$69.84M
QUBT:
-$52.52M
SOUN:
-$124.47M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUBT vs. SOUN — Risk / Return Rank
QUBT
SOUN
QUBT vs. SOUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) and SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUBT | SOUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.00 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | -0.38 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | -0.60 | -0.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUBT vs. SOUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUBT drawdown since its inception was -97.53%, roughly equal to the maximum SOUN drawdown of -93.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBT and SOUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUBT | SOUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.53% | -93.55% | -3.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.37% | -72.43% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.40% | -75.65% | -6.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.33% | -71.52% | +10.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.90% | -66.93% | -5.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.67% | 45.29% | +3.38% |
Volatility
QUBT vs. SOUN - Volatility Comparison
Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) has a higher volatility of 33.55% compared to SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) at 17.69%. This indicates that QUBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SOUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUBT | SOUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.55% | 17.69% | +15.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.37% | 52.15% | +15.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.81% | 80.70% | +23.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 133.05% | 136.27% | -3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 177.48% | 136.27% | +41.21% |
Dividends
QUBT vs. SOUN - Dividend Comparison
Neither QUBT nor SOUN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
QUBT vs. SOUN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quantum Computing, Inc. and SoundHound AI, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
QUBT and SOUN have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QUBT has higher volatility (33.55%) compared to SOUN (17.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUBT dropped -97.53% vs SOUN's -93.55%.
SOUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.34 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUBT and SOUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer