QUBT vs. LUNR
QUBT (Quantum Computing, Inc.) and LUNR (Intuitive Machines Inc. ) are both stocks. QUBT operates in Computer Hardware (Technology), while LUNR operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, QUBT returned 77.69%/yr vs 42.24%/yr for LUNR. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QUBT vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUBT achieves a -3.22% return, which is significantly lower than LUNR's 64.02% return.
QUBT
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -9.97%
- YTD
- -3.22%
- 6M
- -17.59%
- 1Y
- -43.29%
- 3Y*
- 77.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.88%
- 10Y*
- —
LUNR
- 1D
- -13.12%
- 1M
- -25.39%
- YTD
- 64.02%
- 6M
- 122.39%
- 1Y
- 144.44%
- 3Y*
- 42.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUBT vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUBT Quantum Computing, Inc. | -3.22% | -38.01% | 1,712.51% | -39.53% | -55.72% | -54.04% |
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc. | 64.02% | -10.63% | 610.76% | -74.45% | 3.73% | -0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUBT and LUNR is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, QUBT and LUNR have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
QUBT:
$2.22B
LUNR:
$3.94T
QUBT:
-$0.21
LUNR:
-$0.00
QUBT:
428.61
LUNR:
2.95K
QUBT:
$4.33M
LUNR:
$334.27M
QUBT:
-$667.00K
LUNR:
$85.92M
QUBT:
-$52.52M
LUNR:
-$96.76M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUBT vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank
QUBT
LUNR
QUBT vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUBT | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.26 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 3.47 | -4.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 7.12 | -8.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUBT vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUBT drawdown since its inception was -97.53%, roughly equal to the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBT and LUNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUBT | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.53% | -97.43% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.37% | -41.94% | -32.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.40% | -78.54% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.33% | -67.53% | +6.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.90% | -63.21% | -9.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.67% | 20.37% | +28.30% |
Volatility
QUBT vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) is 33.55%, while Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 42.95%. This indicates that QUBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUBT | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.55% | 42.95% | -9.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.37% | 93.42% | -26.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.81% | 111.16% | -7.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 133.05% | 171.29% | -38.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 177.48% | 171.29% | +6.19% |
Dividends
QUBT vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison
Neither QUBT nor LUNR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
QUBT vs. LUNR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quantum Computing, Inc. and Intuitive Machines Inc. . You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
QUBT and LUNR have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LUNR has higher volatility (42.95%) compared to QUBT (33.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUBT dropped -97.53% vs LUNR's -97.43%.
LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUBT and LUNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer