QUASX vs. ALTHX
QUASX (AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio) and ALTHX (AB Municipal Income Fund National Portfolio) are both mutual funds - QUASX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AllianceBernstein, while ALTHX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by AllianceBernstein. Over the past 10 years, QUASX returned 15.65%/yr vs 1.99%/yr for ALTHX. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. QUASX charges 1.11%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ALTHX.
Performance
QUASX vs. ALTHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUASX achieves a 25.68% return, which is significantly higher than ALTHX's 1.68% return. Over the past 10 years, QUASX has outperformed ALTHX with an annualized return of 15.65%, while ALTHX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.99% annualized return.
QUASX
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 6.60%
- YTD
- 25.68%
- 6M
- 21.57%
- 1Y
- 38.11%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.18%
- 10Y*
- 15.65%
ALTHX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 6.56%
- 3Y*
- 4.08%
- 5Y*
- 0.93%
- 10Y*
- 1.99%
QUASX vs. ALTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUASX AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio | 25.68% | 4.85% | 18.49% | 17.83% | -39.09% | 9.76% | 53.85% | 49.85% | -1.02% | 34.71% |
ALTHX AB Municipal Income Fund National Portfolio | 1.68% | 5.05% | 2.36% | 5.76% | -10.06% | 2.15% | 4.77% | 7.22% | 0.46% | 5.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUASX and ALTHX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 1996 | -0.08 |
The correlation between QUASX and ALTHX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUASX vs. ALTHX — Risk / Return Rank
QUASX
ALTHX
QUASX vs. ALTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) and AB Municipal Income Fund National Portfolio (ALTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUASX | ALTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.61 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 2.35 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.78 | 8.15 | +1.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUASX vs. ALTHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUASX drawdown since its inception was -60.97%, which is greater than ALTHX's maximum drawdown of -15.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUASX and ALTHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUASX | ALTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.97% | -15.22% | -45.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.02% | -2.85% | -12.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.68% | -5.46% | -26.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.37% | -14.37% | -33.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.37% | -14.37% | -33.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.46% | +0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.73% | -2.00% | -13.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | 0.82% | +3.27% |
Volatility
QUASX vs. ALTHX - Volatility Comparison
AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) has a higher volatility of 8.06% compared to AB Municipal Income Fund National Portfolio (ALTHX) at 0.74%. This indicates that QUASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUASX | ALTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.06% | 0.74% | +7.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.34% | 2.02% | +17.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.64% | 2.69% | +21.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.51% | 3.89% | +22.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.63% | 3.96% | +21.67% |
QUASX vs. ALTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUASX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than ALTHX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QUASX vs. ALTHX - Dividend Comparison
QUASX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALTHX AB Municipal Income Fund National Portfolio | 3.49% | 4.55% | 3.27% | 2.73% | 2.34% | 1.57% | 2.43% | 2.84% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 3.11% | 3.37% |
QUASX AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.07% | 9.86% | 18.20% | 19.70% | 9.29% | 2.32% | 9.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QUASX and ALTHX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QUASX has higher volatility (8.06%) compared to ALTHX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUASX dropped -60.97% vs ALTHX's -15.22%.
ALTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUASX and ALTHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer