PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUAL vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUAL vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUAL achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly higher than NTSX's 7.28% return.


QUAL

1D
0.47%
1M
2.14%
YTD
9.44%
6M
9.29%
1Y
22.87%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
11.97%
10Y*
14.46%

NTSX

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.68%
YTD
7.28%
6M
7.49%
1Y
23.34%
3Y*
18.55%
5Y*
9.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUAL vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
9.44%12.65%22.29%30.88%-20.50%26.94%17.04%33.89%-10.25%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
7.28%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-7.87%

Correlation

The correlation between QUAL and NTSX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018

0.91

The correlation between QUAL and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

QUAL vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QUAL
NTSX

Technology

36.5%
35.1%

Financial Services

11.5%
12.3%

Communication Services

11.1%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
10.1%

Healthcare

9.0%
8.4%

Industrials

8.2%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.5%

Energy

4.0%
3.5%

Utilities

1.9%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.5%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.4%

Technology

QUAL
36.5%
NTSX
35.1%

Financial Services

QUAL
11.5%
NTSX
12.3%

Communication Services

QUAL
11.1%
NTSX
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

QUAL
9.3%
NTSX
10.1%

Healthcare

QUAL
9.0%
NTSX
8.4%

Industrials

QUAL
8.2%
NTSX
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

QUAL
4.9%
NTSX
5.5%

Energy

QUAL
4.0%
NTSX
3.5%

Utilities

QUAL
1.9%
NTSX
2.1%

Real Estate

QUAL
1.8%
NTSX
1.5%

Basic Materials

QUAL
1.7%
NTSX
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUAL vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUAL
QUAL Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QUAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
QUAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUAL vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QUALNTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.31

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

2.42

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.60

10.43

+0.17

QUAL vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUAL and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QUAL vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUALNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.06%

-31.34%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-9.16%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.00%

-16.82%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.23%

-31.34%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-2.27%

+2.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-6.78%

+2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.13%

-0.14%

Volatility

QUAL vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) is 3.63%, while WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that QUAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUALNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

5.05%

-1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

10.34%

-0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

12.92%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

17.13%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

18.30%

-0.19%

QUAL vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QUAL vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than NTSX's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.09%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
0.87%0.94%1.02%1.23%1.59%1.20%1.39%1.60%2.00%1.76%1.96%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


QUAL and NTSX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSX has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to QUAL (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUAL dropped -34.06% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, QUAL leads with 11.97% vs 9.23% for NTSX. On fees, QUAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QUAL has performed better with a 11.97% return vs 9.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for NTSX.

NTSX has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.87% for QUAL.

QUAL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUAL and 0.20% for NTSX.

QUAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUAL and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer