QUAL vs. NRSH
QUAL (iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF) and NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - QUAL tracks the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index while NRSH tracks the Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QUAL returned 21.68% vs 58.80% for NRSH. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QUAL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NRSH.
Performance
QUAL vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUAL achieves a 8.80% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 47.92% return.
QUAL
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 8.80%
- 6M
- 8.86%
- 1Y
- 21.68%
- 3Y*
- 19.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
NRSH
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 13.93%
- YTD
- 47.92%
- 6M
- 46.01%
- 1Y
- 58.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUAL vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 8.80% | 12.65% | 22.29% | 4.69% |
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 47.92% | 12.95% | -6.17% | 8.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUAL and NRSH is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | 0.63 |
The correlation between QUAL and NRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
QUAL vs. NRSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QUAL
NRSH
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
QUAL
NRSH
Financial Services
QUAL
NRSH
-
Communication Services
QUAL
NRSH
-
Consumer Cyclical
QUAL
NRSH
-
Healthcare
QUAL
NRSH
-
Industrials
QUAL
NRSH
Consumer Defensive
QUAL
NRSH
-
Energy
QUAL
NRSH
Utilities
QUAL
NRSH
-
Real Estate
QUAL
NRSH
Basic Materials
QUAL
NRSH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUAL vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank
QUAL
NRSH
QUAL vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QUAL | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.40 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 5.40 | -2.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.00 | 16.86 | -5.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QUAL | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 2.42 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 1.11 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
QUAL vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUAL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, which is greater than NRSH's maximum drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUAL and NRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUAL | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.06% | -24.01% | -10.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -10.94% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | 0.00% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -5.62% | +1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 3.50% | -1.52% |
Volatility
QUAL vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) is 2.51%, while Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a volatility of 9.21%. This indicates that QUAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUAL | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.51% | 9.21% | -6.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | 20.27% | -11.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.83% | 24.44% | -12.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 21.54% | -4.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 21.54% | -3.44% |
QUAL vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QUAL vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison
QUAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than NRSH's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 0.28% | 0.42% | 0.90% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | 0.88% | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 1.39% | 1.60% | 2.00% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QUAL and NRSH have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NRSH has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to QUAL (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QUAL dropped -34.06% vs NRSH's -24.01%.
On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 58.80% vs 21.68% for QUAL. On fees, QUAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 58.80% return vs 21.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NRSH.
QUAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.28% for NRSH.
QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index, while NRSH tracks Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QUAL and 0.75% for NRSH.
NRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QUAL and NRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer