QTUM vs. TRUT
QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. QTUM is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QTUM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.
Performance
QTUM vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 53.29% return, which is significantly higher than TRUT's 25.30% return.
QTUM
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 23.63%
- YTD
- 53.29%
- 6M
- 50.69%
- 1Y
- 95.36%
- 3Y*
- 52.22%
- 5Y*
- 29.15%
- 10Y*
- —
TRUT
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 16.68%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 6M
- 24.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 53.29% | 20.47% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 25.30% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTUM and TRUT is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTUM vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank
QTUM
TRUT
QTUM vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTUM | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.28 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.69 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTUM | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 2.39 | -1.32 |
Drawdowns
QTUM vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and TRUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTUM | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.45% | -18.55% | -19.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -1.46% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -5.17% | -3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | — | — |
Volatility
QTUM vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTUM | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.76% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.26% | 21.53% | +4.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.56% | 21.53% | +5.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 21.53% | +5.64% |
QTUM vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTUM vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison
QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than TRUT's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.70% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.19% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTUM and TRUT have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.19% for TRUT.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.13% for TRUT.
Find the right allocation for QTUM and TRUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer