QTUM vs. SPMO
QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QTUM returned 29.15%/yr vs 24.29%/yr for SPMO. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QTUM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
QTUM vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 53.29% return, which is significantly higher than SPMO's 30.35% return.
QTUM
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 23.63%
- YTD
- 53.29%
- 6M
- 50.69%
- 1Y
- 95.36%
- 3Y*
- 52.22%
- 5Y*
- 29.15%
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
QTUM vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 53.29% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.02% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -14.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTUM and SPMO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018 | 0.74 |
The correlation between QTUM and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
QTUM vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTUM
SPMO
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
QTUM
SPMO
Industrials
QTUM
SPMO
Communication Services
QTUM
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
QTUM
SPMO
Healthcare
QTUM
SPMO
Basic Materials
QTUM
-
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
QTUM
-
SPMO
Energy
QTUM
-
SPMO
Financial Services
QTUM
-
SPMO
Real Estate
QTUM
-
SPMO
Utilities
QTUM
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTUM vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
QTUM
SPMO
QTUM vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTUM | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.47 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.28 | 3.64 | +2.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.69 | 14.17 | +9.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTUM | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65 | 2.62 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 1.27 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 1.01 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
QTUM vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTUM | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.45% | -30.95% | -7.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | -12.70% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.39% | -20.13% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.45% | -22.74% | -15.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | 0.00% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -4.60% | -3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 3.26% | +0.78% |
Volatility
QTUM vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 7.35%. This indicates that QTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTUM | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.76% | 7.35% | +2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.35% | 14.39% | +5.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.26% | 17.64% | +8.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.56% | 19.30% | +7.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 20.31% | +6.86% |
QTUM vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTUM vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than SPMO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.70% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTUM and SPMO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to SPMO (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 29.15% vs 24.29% for SPMO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 29.15% return vs 24.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.65% for SPMO.
QTUM is categorized as Technology Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.13% for SPMO.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTUM and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer