QTUM vs. KNCT
QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) and KNCT (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - QTUM tracks the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index while KNCT tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QTUM returned 29.15%/yr vs 21.73%/yr for KNCT. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
QTUM vs. KNCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 53.29% return, which is significantly lower than KNCT's 63.41% return.
QTUM
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 23.63%
- YTD
- 53.29%
- 6M
- 50.69%
- 1Y
- 95.36%
- 3Y*
- 52.22%
- 5Y*
- 29.15%
- 10Y*
- —
KNCT
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 26.38%
- YTD
- 63.41%
- 6M
- 62.53%
- 1Y
- 99.38%
- 3Y*
- 43.36%
- 5Y*
- 21.73%
- 10Y*
- 21.42%
QTUM vs. KNCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 53.29% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.02% |
KNCT Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 63.41% | 28.65% | 19.41% | 27.39% | -29.54% | 21.83% | 39.14% | 26.35% | -15.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTUM and KNCT is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018 | 0.83 |
The correlation between QTUM and KNCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
QTUM vs. KNCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTUM
KNCT
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
QTUM
KNCT
Industrials
QTUM
KNCT
Communication Services
QTUM
KNCT
Consumer Cyclical
QTUM
KNCT
-
Healthcare
QTUM
KNCT
-
Basic Materials
QTUM
-
KNCT
-
Consumer Defensive
QTUM
-
KNCT
-
Energy
QTUM
-
KNCT
-
Financial Services
QTUM
-
KNCT
Real Estate
QTUM
-
KNCT
Utilities
QTUM
-
KNCT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTUM vs. KNCT — Risk / Return Rank
QTUM
KNCT
QTUM vs. KNCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTUM | KNCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.76 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.28 | 10.00 | -3.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.69 | 44.01 | -20.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTUM | KNCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65 | 4.70 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 0.94 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.58 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
QTUM vs. KNCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, smaller than the maximum KNCT drawdown of -57.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and KNCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTUM | KNCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.45% | -57.18% | +18.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | -9.99% | -5.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.39% | -21.40% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.45% | -34.55% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -0.63% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -10.74% | +2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 2.27% | +1.77% |
Volatility
QTUM vs. KNCT - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) at 9.19%. This indicates that QTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTUM | KNCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.76% | 9.19% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.35% | 17.12% | +3.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.26% | 21.28% | +4.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.56% | 23.19% | +3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 22.97% | +4.20% |
QTUM vs. KNCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QTUM and KNCT have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
QTUM vs. KNCT - Dividend Comparison
QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than KNCT's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNCT Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 0.57% | 0.86% | 1.38% | 0.60% | 2.24% | 0.55% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 1.22% | 0.66% | 0.44% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.70% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTUM and KNCT have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to KNCT (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs KNCT's -57.18%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 29.15% vs 21.73% for KNCT. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, KNCT has been the lower-risk option at 9.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 29.15% return vs 21.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTUM and KNCT have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.57% for KNCT.
QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while KNCT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Invesco.
KNCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 3.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTUM and KNCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer