QTUM vs. HGER

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) and HGER (Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while HGER is a Commodities fund tracking the Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QTUM returned 41.66%/yr vs 19.08%/yr for HGER. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QTUM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for HGER.

Performance

QTUM vs. HGER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QTUM having a 29.22% return and HGER slightly lower at 28.53%.

QTUM

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -15.81%
• 6M: 19.65%
• YTD: 29.22%
• 1Y: 50.12%
• 3Y*: 41.66%
• 5Y*: 24.90%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 25.72%

HGER

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 6.65%
• 6M: 24.03%
• YTD: 28.53%
• 1Y: 37.92%
• 3Y*: 19.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTUM vs. HGER - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	29.22%	36.65%	50.54%	39.86%	-23.85%
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF	28.53%	20.08%	9.25%	1.93%	9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between QTUM and HGER is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022	0.15

Return for Risk

QTUM vs. HGER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 69
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 60
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 75

HGER

HGER Risk / Return Rank: 80
HGER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
HGER Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
HGER Omega Ratio Rank: 86
HGER Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
HGER Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTUM vs. HGER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QTUM	HGER	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	2.17	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.90	-0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.39	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	2.71	+0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.12	9.68	+0.44

QTUM vs. HGER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTUM Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the HGER Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTUM and HGER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QTUM vs. HGER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, which is greater than HGER's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and HGER.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTUM	HGER	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.45%	-23.31%	-15.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.20%	-14.04%	-2.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.39%	-14.04%	-11.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.20%	-4.69%	-11.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.23%	-7.69%	-0.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.97%	3.93%	+1.04%

Volatility

QTUM vs. HGER - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a higher volatility of 10.67% compared to Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) at 6.11%. This indicates that QTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HGER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTUM	HGER	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.67%	6.11%	+4.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.32%	15.51%	+9.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.60%	17.57%	+13.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.46%	17.68%	+9.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.58%	17.68%	+9.90%

QTUM vs. HGER - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HGER's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

QTUM vs. HGER - Dividend Comparison

QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than HGER's 5.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF	5.51%	7.09%	3.28%	7.24%	0.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.83%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTUM and HGER in my portfolio?

QTUM and HGER have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QTUM or HGER?

QTUM has higher volatility (10.67%) compared to HGER (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs HGER's -23.31%.

Which ETF is better, QTUM or HGER?

On 3-year performance, QTUM leads with 41.66% vs 19.08% for HGER. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, HGER has been the lower-risk option at 6.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QTUM or HGER?

Over the 3-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 41.66% return vs 19.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QTUM or HGER?

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for HGER.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QTUM or HGER?

HGER has the higher dividend yield at 5.51%, compared with 0.83% for QTUM.

What is the main difference between QTUM and HGER?

QTUM is categorized as Technology Equities, while HGER is Commodities. QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while HGER tracks Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.68% for HGER.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HGER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.