PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTUM vs. FETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTUM vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 47.39% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -44.01% return.


QTUM

1D
1.22%
1M
9.88%
YTD
47.39%
6M
45.72%
1Y
82.93%
3Y*
48.15%
5Y*
28.09%
10Y*

FETH

1D
-1.01%
1M
-26.28%
YTD
-44.01%
6M
-46.08%
1Y
-38.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTUM vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
47.39%36.65%27.59%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-44.01%-11.37%-4.68%

Correlation

The correlation between QTUM and FETH is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024

0.54

The correlation between QTUM and FETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTUM vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTUM vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QTUMFETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

0.94

+0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.46

-0.57

+6.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.77

-0.98

+20.74

QTUM vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTUM Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is higher than the FETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTUM and FETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTUM vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -67.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and FETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTUMFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.45%

-67.57%

+29.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.26%

-67.57%

+52.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.42%

-65.74%

+61.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-33.30%

+25.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

39.31%

-35.10%

Volatility

QTUM vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) is 14.18%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 17.03%. This indicates that QTUM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTUMFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.18%

17.03%

-2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.17%

46.32%

-23.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.39%

69.12%

-40.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.99%

72.38%

-45.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.40%

72.38%

-44.98%

QTUM vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTUM vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.73%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTUM and FETH have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FETH has higher volatility (17.03%) compared to QTUM (14.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs FETH's -67.57%.

On 1-year performance, QTUM leads with 82.93% vs -38.43% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, QTUM has been the lower-risk option at 14.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 82.93% return vs -38.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.

QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.

QTUM is categorized as Technology Equities, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while FETH tracks Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.25% for FETH.

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTUM and FETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer