PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTUM vs. BOTG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QTUM vs. BOTG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QTUM vs. BOTG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
-0.14%36.65%50.54%39.86%-28.80%-1.40%
BOTG.L
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing
-5.93%13.42%13.06%39.60%-42.85%-6.14%
Different Trading Currencies

QTUM is traded in USD, while BOTG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BOTG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a -0.14% return, which is significantly higher than BOTG.L's -5.93% return.


QTUM

1D
1.85%
1M
-6.11%
YTD
-0.14%
6M
3.08%
1Y
47.58%
3Y*
34.18%
5Y*
18.84%
10Y*

BOTG.L

1D
4.68%
1M
-9.58%
YTD
-5.93%
6M
-2.86%
1Y
20.69%
3Y*
11.45%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QTUM vs. BOTG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QTUM vs. BOTG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTG.L
BOTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTUM vs. BOTG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTUMBOTG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

0.57

+1.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.24

1.05

+1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.15

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

1.09

+2.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.08

3.54

+7.54

QTUM vs. BOTG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTUM Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTUM and BOTG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTUMBOTG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

0.57

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

-0.08

+0.93

Correlation

The correlation between QTUM and BOTG.L is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QTUM vs. BOTG.L - Dividend Comparison

QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than BOTG.L's 0.26% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
1.07%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%
BOTG.L
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing
0.26%0.27%0.24%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QTUM vs. BOTG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, smaller than the maximum BOTG.L drawdown of -53.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and BOTG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QTUMBOTG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.45%

-43.70%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.26%

-17.19%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.34%

-11.75%

+2.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.40%

-19.84%

+11.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.36%

5.84%

-1.48%

Volatility

QTUM vs. BOTG.L - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) have volatilities of 9.77% and 9.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QTUMBOTG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.77%

9.33%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.87%

17.37%

+3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.70%

36.35%

-6.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.21%

29.84%

-3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.05%

29.84%

-2.79%