QTSSX vs. SVARX
QTSSX (Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund) and SVARX (Spectrum Low Volatility Fund) are both mutual funds - QTSSX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Advisors Preferred, while SVARX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by Advisors Preferred. Over the past 5 years, QTSSX returned -3.91%/yr vs 3.26%/yr for SVARX. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QTSSX charges 1.56%/yr vs 2.34%/yr for SVARX.
Performance
QTSSX vs. SVARX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTSSX achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly higher than SVARX's 1.44% return.
QTSSX
- 1D
- 2.71%
- 1M
- 12.39%
- YTD
- 17.70%
- 6M
- 14.66%
- 1Y
- 40.42%
- 3Y*
- 14.48%
- 5Y*
- -3.91%
- 10Y*
- —
SVARX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- 1Y
- 6.17%
- 3Y*
- 6.90%
- 5Y*
- 3.26%
- 10Y*
- 6.10%
QTSSX vs. SVARX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTSSX Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund | 17.70% | 4.10% | 13.88% | 13.97% | -27.55% | -16.61% |
SVARX Spectrum Low Volatility Fund | 1.44% | 6.22% | 2.60% | 9.67% | -4.35% | 2.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTSSX and SVARX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2021 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTSSX vs. SVARX — Risk / Return Rank
QTSSX
SVARX
QTSSX vs. SVARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) and Spectrum Low Volatility Fund (SVARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTSSX | SVARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 2.34 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.63 | 3.13 | -0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.50 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 2.45 | +1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.80 | 5.84 | +3.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTSSX | SVARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 2.34 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 1.06 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 1.70 | -1.74 |
Drawdowns
QTSSX vs. SVARX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTSSX drawdown since its inception was -52.27%, which is greater than SVARX's maximum drawdown of -6.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTSSX and SVARX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTSSX | SVARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.27% | -6.48% | -45.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.53% | -2.55% | -8.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.77% | -2.55% | -22.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.27% | -6.48% | -45.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -6.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.37% | -1.36% | -17.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.89% | -1.22% | -34.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 1.07% | +3.13% |
Volatility
QTSSX vs. SVARX - Volatility Comparison
Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) has a higher volatility of 8.40% compared to Spectrum Low Volatility Fund (SVARX) at 0.64%. This indicates that QTSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTSSX | SVARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.40% | 0.64% | +7.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.65% | 2.16% | +12.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.49% | 2.66% | +17.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 3.09% | +19.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.65% | 3.68% | +19.97% |
QTSSX vs. SVARX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTSSX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is lower than SVARX's 2.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTSSX vs. SVARX - Dividend Comparison
QTSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than SVARX's 5.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTSSX Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 6.30% | 0.19% | 3.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SVARX Spectrum Low Volatility Fund | 5.86% | 5.95% | 9.35% | 3.35% | 0.00% | 5.85% | 0.71% | 4.91% | 2.41% | 6.90% | 9.07% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTSSX and SVARX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTSSX has higher volatility (8.40%) compared to SVARX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTSSX dropped -52.27% vs SVARX's -6.48%.
SVARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTSSX and SVARX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer