PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTSSX vs. SVARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTSSX vs. SVARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) and Spectrum Low Volatility Fund (SVARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTSSX achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly higher than SVARX's 1.44% return.


QTSSX

1D
2.71%
1M
12.39%
YTD
17.70%
6M
14.66%
1Y
40.42%
3Y*
14.48%
5Y*
-3.91%
10Y*

SVARX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.63%
YTD
1.44%
6M
2.26%
1Y
6.17%
3Y*
6.90%
5Y*
3.26%
10Y*
6.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTSSX vs. SVARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QTSSX
Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund
17.70%4.10%13.88%13.97%-27.55%-16.61%
SVARX
Spectrum Low Volatility Fund
1.44%6.22%2.60%9.67%-4.35%2.76%

Correlation

The correlation between QTSSX and SVARX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2021

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTSSX vs. SVARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTSSX
QTSSX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QTSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
QTSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SVARX
SVARX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SVARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVARX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SVARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVARX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTSSX vs. SVARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) and Spectrum Low Volatility Fund (SVARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTSSXSVARXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.02

2.34

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.63

3.13

-0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.50

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

2.45

+1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.80

5.84

+3.96

QTSSX vs. SVARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTSSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the SVARX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTSSX and SVARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTSSXSVARXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.34

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

1.06

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

1.70

-1.74

Drawdowns

QTSSX vs. SVARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTSSX drawdown since its inception was -52.27%, which is greater than SVARX's maximum drawdown of -6.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTSSX and SVARX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTSSXSVARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.27%

-6.48%

-45.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.53%

-2.55%

-8.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.77%

-2.55%

-22.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.27%

-6.48%

-45.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.37%

-1.36%

-17.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.89%

-1.22%

-34.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

1.07%

+3.13%

Volatility

QTSSX vs. SVARX - Volatility Comparison

Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund (QTSSX) has a higher volatility of 8.40% compared to Spectrum Low Volatility Fund (SVARX) at 0.64%. This indicates that QTSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTSSXSVARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.40%

0.64%

+7.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.65%

2.16%

+12.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.49%

2.66%

+17.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.89%

3.09%

+19.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.65%

3.68%

+19.97%

QTSSX vs. SVARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTSSX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is lower than SVARX's 2.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTSSX vs. SVARX - Dividend Comparison

QTSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than SVARX's 5.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QTSSX
Quantified Tactical Sectors Fund
0.38%0.45%0.00%6.30%0.19%3.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SVARX
Spectrum Low Volatility Fund
5.86%5.95%9.35%3.35%0.00%5.85%0.71%4.91%2.41%6.90%9.07%3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTSSX and SVARX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTSSX has higher volatility (8.40%) compared to SVARX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTSSX dropped -52.27% vs SVARX's -6.48%.

SVARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTSSX and SVARX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer