PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SVARX vs. ACWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SVARX vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Spectrum Low Volatility Fund (SVARX) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVARX achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than ACWV's 3.00% return. Over the past 10 years, SVARX has underperformed ACWV with an annualized return of 6.10%, while ACWV has yielded a comparatively higher 7.43% annualized return.


SVARX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.63%
YTD
1.44%
6M
2.26%
1Y
6.17%
3Y*
6.90%
5Y*
3.26%
10Y*
6.10%

ACWV

1D
0.10%
1M
1.17%
YTD
3.00%
6M
3.07%
1Y
5.17%
3Y*
10.29%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
7.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVARX vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SVARX
Spectrum Low Volatility Fund
1.44%6.22%2.60%9.67%-4.35%4.10%19.50%9.42%-0.99%8.25%
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
3.00%11.04%11.38%8.23%-10.36%13.97%3.04%21.04%-1.42%18.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SVARX and ACWV is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2013

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SVARX vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVARX
SVARX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SVARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVARX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SVARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVARX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWV
ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVARX vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Spectrum Low Volatility Fund (SVARX) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SVARXACWVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.34

0.68

+1.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.13

1.00

+2.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.12

+0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

0.87

+1.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.84

2.74

+3.10

SVARX vs. ACWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVARX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the ACWV Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVARX and ACWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SVARXACWVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

0.68

+1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

0.56

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.66

0.61

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.70

0.71

+0.99

Drawdowns

SVARX vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVARX drawdown since its inception was -6.48%, smaller than the maximum ACWV drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVARX and ACWV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SVARXACWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.48%

-28.82%

+22.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.55%

-6.37%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.55%

-7.56%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.48%

-18.14%

+11.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.48%

-28.82%

+22.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-2.31%

+0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.22%

-3.11%

+1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

2.02%

-0.95%

Volatility

SVARX vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Spectrum Low Volatility Fund (SVARX) is 0.64%, while iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) has a volatility of 1.74%. This indicates that SVARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SVARXACWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

1.74%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.16%

5.56%

-3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66%

7.69%

-5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.09%

10.22%

-7.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.68%

12.31%

-8.63%

SVARX vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVARX has a 2.34% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SVARX vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison

SVARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, more than ACWV's 2.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
2.03%2.09%2.33%2.41%2.18%1.92%1.77%2.54%2.32%2.04%2.56%2.28%
SVARX
Spectrum Low Volatility Fund
5.86%5.95%9.35%3.35%0.00%5.85%0.71%4.91%2.41%6.90%9.07%3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


SVARX and ACWV have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACWV has higher volatility (1.74%) compared to SVARX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVARX dropped -6.48% vs ACWV's -28.82%.

SVARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SVARX and ACWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer