PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTOP vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTOP vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTOP achieves a 17.15% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -13.49% return.


QTOP

1D
-3.69%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
17.15%
6M
15.48%
1Y
38.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SLV

1D
-5.40%
1M
-18.48%
YTD
-13.49%
6M
-14.05%
1Y
69.08%
3Y*
39.38%
5Y*
18.31%
10Y*
12.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTOP vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
17.15%22.19%6.25%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-13.49%144.66%-14.26%

Correlation

The correlation between QTOP and SLV is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2024

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTOP vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTOP
QTOP Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
QTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTOP vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QTOPSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.25

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

1.47

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.59

3.16

+7.42

QTOP vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTOP Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTOP and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTOP vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTOP drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOP and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTOPSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.28%

-76.28%

+53.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.88%

-47.23%

+34.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.74%

-47.23%

+42.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-44.65%

+40.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

21.91%

-18.30%

Volatility

QTOP vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) is 9.71%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 14.34%. This indicates that QTOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTOPSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.71%

14.34%

-4.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.00%

59.27%

-43.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.50%

60.33%

-40.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.44%

36.59%

-13.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.44%

32.09%

-8.65%

QTOP vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTOP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTOP vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
0.33%0.38%0.11%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTOP and SLV have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (14.34%) compared to QTOP (9.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTOP dropped -23.28% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 1-year performance, SLV leads with 69.08% vs 38.12% for QTOP. On fees, QTOP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QTOP has been the lower-risk option at 9.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SLV has performed better with a 69.08% return vs 38.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTOP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

QTOP has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

QTOP is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SLV is Silver. QTOP tracks Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QTOP and 0.50% for SLV.

QTOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTOP and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer