PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTOP vs. QQUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTOP vs. QQUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTOP achieves a 16.30% return, which is significantly higher than QQUP's -5.71% return.


QTOP

1D
-0.72%
1M
-2.13%
YTD
16.30%
6M
14.37%
1Y
35.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQUP

1D
-1.88%
1M
-18.41%
YTD
-5.71%
6M
-8.46%
1Y
31.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTOP vs. QQUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
16.30%18.40%
QQUP
ProShares Ultra Top QQQ
-5.71%45.33%

Correlation

The correlation between QTOP and QQUP is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.91

The correlation between QTOP and QQUP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTOP vs. QQUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTOP
QTOP Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

QQUP
QQUP Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
QQUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQUP Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QQUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQUP Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTOP vs. QQUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QTOPQQUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.16

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

0.85

+1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.77

2.36

+7.41

QTOP vs. QQUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTOP Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the QQUP Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTOP and QQUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTOP vs. QQUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTOP drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, smaller than the maximum QQUP drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOP and QQUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTOPQQUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.28%

-37.67%

+14.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.88%

-37.67%

+24.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.43%

-22.94%

+17.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-9.54%

+5.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

13.53%

-9.90%

Volatility

QTOP vs. QQUP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) is 9.72%, while ProShares Ultra Top QQQ (QQUP) has a volatility of 14.05%. This indicates that QTOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTOPQQUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.72%

14.05%

-4.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.96%

30.57%

-14.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.49%

40.06%

-20.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.42%

39.76%

-16.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.42%

39.76%

-16.34%

QTOP vs. QQUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTOP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QQUP's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTOP vs. QQUP - Dividend Comparison

QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than QQUP's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
QQUP
ProShares Ultra Top QQQ
0.51%0.29%0.00%
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
0.34%0.38%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, QTOP and QQUP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQUP has higher volatility (14.05%) compared to QTOP (9.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTOP dropped -23.28% vs QQUP's -37.67%.

On 1-year performance, QTOP leads with 35.33% vs 31.81% for QQUP. On fees, QTOP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QTOP has been the lower-risk option at 9.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QTOP has performed better with a 35.33% return vs 31.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTOP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQUP.

QQUP has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.34% for QTOP.

QTOP is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QQUP is Leveraged Equities. QTOP tracks Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index, while QQUP tracks Nasdaq-100 Mega Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QTOP and 0.95% for QQUP.

QTOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTOP and QQUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer