QTOP vs. QQQG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QTOP (iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF) and QQQG (Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QTOP is passively managed, while QQQG is actively managed. Over the past year, QTOP returned 45.99% vs 42.60% for QQQG. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QTOP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for QQQG.

Performance

QTOP vs. QQQG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTOP achieves a 22.71% return, which is significantly lower than QQQG's 32.43% return.

QTOP

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 10.74%
• YTD: 22.71%
• 6M: 21.95%
• 1Y: 45.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQG

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 17.75%
• YTD: 32.43%
• 6M: 30.01%
• 1Y: 42.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTOP vs. QQQG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF	22.71%	22.19%	5.80%
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	32.43%	14.72%	0.92%

Correlation

The correlation between QTOP and QQQG is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024	0.84

The correlation between QTOP and QQQG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

QTOP vs. QQQG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QTOP	QQQG
Technology	57.7%	68.6%
Communication Services	17.7%	10.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	3.6%
Consumer Defensive	8.5%	1.5%
Healthcare	3.3%	12.1%
Basic Materials	1.5%	-
Industrials	0.9%	2.6%
Energy	-	1.4%
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

QTOP vs. QQQG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTOP

QTOP Risk / Return Rank: 74
QTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
QTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
QTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 74
QTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
QTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 70

QQQG

QQQG Risk / Return Rank: 62
QQQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
QQQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QQQG Omega Ratio Rank: 59
QQQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QQQG Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTOP vs. QQQG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QTOP	QQQG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.66	2.18	+0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	2.88	+0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.37	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.59	3.10	+0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.20	11.16	+2.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QTOP vs. QQQG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTOP Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the QQQG Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTOP and QQQG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QTOP	QQQG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.66	2.18	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.48	1.20	+0.28

Drawdowns

QTOP vs. QQQG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTOP drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQG drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOP and QQQG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTOP	QQQG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.28%	-23.61%	+0.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.88%	-13.79%	+0.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	0.00%	-0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.82%	-3.60%	-0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.49%	3.83%	-0.34%

Volatility

QTOP vs. QQQG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) have volatilities of 5.23% and 5.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTOP	QQQG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.23%	5.26%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.43%	16.03%	-2.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.40%	19.65%	-2.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.70%	23.41%	-0.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.70%	23.41%	-0.71%

QTOP vs. QQQG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTOP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQG's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

QTOP vs. QQQG - Dividend Comparison

QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, more than QQQG's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.04%	0.06%	0.11%
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF	0.32%	0.38%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTOP and QQQG in my portfolio?

QTOP and QQQG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QTOP or QQQG?

QQQG has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to QTOP (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTOP dropped -23.28% vs QQQG's -23.61%.

Which ETF is better, QTOP or QQQG?

On 1-year performance, QTOP leads with 45.99% vs 42.60% for QQQG. On fees, QTOP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QTOP or QQQG?

Over the 1-year period, QTOP has performed better with a 45.99% return vs 42.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QTOP or QQQG?

QTOP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QQQG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QTOP or QQQG?

QTOP has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.04% for QQQG.

What is the main difference between QTOP and QQQG?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QTOP and 0.49% for QQQG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.