PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTOP vs. QQQA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTOP vs. QQQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTOP achieves a 22.71% return, which is significantly lower than QQQA's 65.37% return.


QTOP

1D
-0.21%
1M
10.74%
YTD
22.71%
6M
21.95%
1Y
45.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQA

1D
2.20%
1M
23.31%
YTD
65.37%
6M
67.98%
1Y
88.43%
3Y*
34.58%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTOP vs. QQQA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
22.71%22.19%5.80%
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
65.37%9.87%3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between QTOP and QQQA is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024

0.83

The correlation between QTOP and QQQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

QTOP vs. QQQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QTOP
QQQA

Technology

57.7%
65.2%

Communication Services

17.7%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%

-

Healthcare

3.3%
7.8%

Basic Materials

1.5%

-

Industrials

0.9%

-

Energy

-

9.1%

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

QTOP
57.7%
QQQA
65.2%

Communication Services

QTOP
17.7%
QQQA
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

QTOP
10.4%
QQQA
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

QTOP
8.5%
QQQA

-

Healthcare

QTOP
3.3%
QQQA
7.8%

Basic Materials

QTOP
1.5%
QQQA

-

Industrials

QTOP
0.9%
QQQA

-

Energy

QTOP

-

QQQA
9.1%

Financial Services

QTOP

-

QQQA

-

Real Estate

QTOP

-

QQQA

-

Utilities

QTOP

-

QQQA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTOP vs. QQQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTOP
QTOP Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQA
QQQA Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QQQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTOP vs. QQQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTOPQQQADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.54

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

6.11

-2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.20

22.85

-9.64

QTOP vs. QQQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTOP Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the QQQA Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTOP and QQQA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTOPQQQADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

3.41

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.48

0.59

+0.90

Drawdowns

QTOP vs. QQQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTOP drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, smaller than the maximum QQQA drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOP and QQQA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTOPQQQADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.28%

-38.44%

+15.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.88%

-14.54%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

0.00%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-15.68%

+11.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

3.88%

-0.39%

Volatility

QTOP vs. QQQA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) is 5.23%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that QTOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTOPQQQADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

10.17%

-4.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.43%

22.18%

-8.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.40%

26.05%

-8.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.70%

25.83%

-3.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.70%

25.77%

-3.07%

QTOP vs. QQQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTOP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQA's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTOP vs. QQQA - Dividend Comparison

QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, more than QQQA's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.06%0.10%0.09%0.34%0.28%0.10%
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
0.32%0.38%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTOP and QQQA have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQA has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to QTOP (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTOP dropped -23.28% vs QQQA's -38.44%.

On 1-year performance, QQQA leads with 88.43% vs 45.99% for QTOP. On fees, QTOP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QTOP has been the lower-risk option at 5.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 88.43% return vs 45.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTOP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QQQA.

QTOP has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.06% for QQQA.

QTOP tracks Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index, while QQQA tracks NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QTOP and 0.58% for QQQA.

QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTOP and QQQA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer