PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTOP vs. QNXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTOP vs. QNXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTOP achieves a 17.15% return, which is significantly higher than QNXT's 12.44% return.


QTOP

1D
-3.69%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
17.15%
6M
15.48%
1Y
38.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QNXT

1D
-1.96%
1M
1.83%
YTD
12.44%
6M
11.37%
1Y
21.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTOP vs. QNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
17.15%22.19%6.25%
QNXT
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
12.44%14.97%-2.58%

Correlation

The correlation between QTOP and QNXT is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2024

0.76

The correlation between QTOP and QNXT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

QTOP vs. QNXT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QTOP
QNXT

Technology

62.3%
45.3%

Communication Services

15.7%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
15.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
5.5%

Healthcare

2.9%
6.8%

Basic Materials

1.4%

-

Industrials

0.9%
9.7%

Energy

-

2.3%

Financial Services

-

0.8%

Real Estate

-

0.3%

Utilities

-

5.4%

Technology

QTOP
62.3%
QNXT
45.3%

Communication Services

QTOP
15.7%
QNXT
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

QTOP
9.9%
QNXT
15.1%

Consumer Defensive

QTOP
6.9%
QNXT
5.5%

Healthcare

QTOP
2.9%
QNXT
6.8%

Basic Materials

QTOP
1.4%
QNXT

-

Industrials

QTOP
0.9%
QNXT
9.7%

Energy

QTOP

-

QNXT
2.3%

Financial Services

QTOP

-

QNXT
0.8%

Real Estate

QTOP

-

QNXT
0.3%

Utilities

QTOP

-

QNXT
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTOP vs. QNXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTOP
QTOP Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
QTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

QNXT
QNXT Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
QNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
QNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
QNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
QNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTOP vs. QNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QTOPQNXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.23

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

2.09

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.59

6.69

+3.90

QTOP vs. QNXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTOP Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the QNXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTOP and QNXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTOP vs. QNXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTOP drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, roughly equal to the maximum QNXT drawdown of -22.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOP and QNXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTOPQNXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.28%

-22.25%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.88%

-10.16%

-2.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.74%

-3.39%

-1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-3.74%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

3.17%

+0.44%

Volatility

QTOP vs. QNXT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) at 6.86%. This indicates that QTOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QNXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTOPQNXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.71%

6.86%

+2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.00%

12.01%

+3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.50%

15.94%

+3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.44%

19.94%

+3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.44%

19.94%

+3.50%

QTOP vs. QNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QTOP and QNXT have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QTOP vs. QNXT - Dividend Comparison

QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than QNXT's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
QNXT
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
0.67%0.64%0.22%
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
0.33%0.38%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTOP and QNXT have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTOP has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to QNXT (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTOP dropped -23.28% vs QNXT's -22.25%.

On 1-year performance, QTOP leads with 38.12% vs 21.16% for QNXT. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, QNXT has been the lower-risk option at 6.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QTOP has performed better with a 38.12% return vs 21.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTOP and QNXT have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

QNXT has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.33% for QTOP.

QTOP tracks Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index, while QNXT tracks Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 UCITS Index.

QTOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTOP and QNXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer