QTOP vs. LQQ.PA
QTOP (iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF) and LQQ.PA (Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QTOP tracks the Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index while LQQ.PA tracks the Nasdaq 100® Leverage (2x) index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QTOP returned 31.99% vs 30886.74% for LQQ.PA. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QTOP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LQQ.PA.
Performance
QTOP vs. LQQ.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QTOP is traded in USD, while LQQ.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LQQ.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTOP achieves a 16.89% return, which is significantly lower than LQQ.PA's 25,608.77% return.
QTOP
- 1D
- -2.23%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- 14.49%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 1Y
- 31.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQQ.PA
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 19,506.49%
- 6M
- 24,968.92%
- YTD
- 25,608.77%
- 1Y
- 30,886.74%
- 3Y*
- 714.44%
- 5Y*
- 246.05%
- 10Y*
- 128.72%
QTOP vs. LQQ.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 16.89% | 22.19% | 6.25% |
LQQ.PA Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage | 25,608.77% | 29.52% | 9.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTOP and LQQ.PA is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2024 | 0.68 |
The correlation between QTOP and LQQ.PA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTOP vs. LQQ.PA — Risk / Return Rank
QTOP
LQQ.PA
QTOP vs. LQQ.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QTOP | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -888.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 109.92 | -108.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 1,293.45 | -1,290.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.57 | 4,184.70 | -4,176.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QTOP vs. LQQ.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTOP drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, smaller than the maximum LQQ.PA drawdown of -78.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOP and LQQ.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTOP | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.28% | -78.94% | +55.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.88% | -22.82% | +9.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.94% | -2.46% | -2.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.81% | -16.62% | +12.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 7.08% | -3.34% |
Volatility
QTOP vs. LQQ.PA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) is 9.50%, while Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA) has a volatility of 531.38%. This indicates that QTOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQQ.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTOP | LQQ.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.50% | 531.38% | -521.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.98% | 531.58% | -514.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.27% | 20,066.92% | -20,046.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.56% | 8,967.26% | -8,943.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.56% | 6,334.63% | -6,311.07% |
QTOP vs. LQQ.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTOP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LQQ.PA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTOP vs. LQQ.PA - Dividend Comparison
QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while LQQ.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LQQ.PA Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTOP and LQQ.PA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTOP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTOP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for LQQ.PA.
QTOP tracks Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index, while LQQ.PA tracks Nasdaq 100® Leverage (2x) index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QTOP and 0.60% for LQQ.PA.
Find the right allocation for QTOP and LQQ.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer