QTOP vs. ANAU.DE
QTOP (iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF) and ANAU.DE (AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QTOP tracks the Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index while ANAU.DE tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QTOP returned 44.62% vs 40.55% for ANAU.DE. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QTOP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for ANAU.DE.
Performance
QTOP vs. ANAU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTOP achieves a 21.83% return, which is significantly higher than ANAU.DE's 19.26% return.
QTOP
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 8.47%
- YTD
- 21.83%
- 6M
- 20.96%
- 1Y
- 44.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANAU.DE
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 8.54%
- YTD
- 19.26%
- 6M
- 19.18%
- 1Y
- 40.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTOP vs. ANAU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 21.83% | 22.19% | 5.80% |
ANAU.DE AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 19.26% | 20.55% | 5.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTOP and ANAU.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024 | 0.65 |
The correlation between QTOP and ANAU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTOP vs. ANAU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QTOP
ANAU.DE
QTOP vs. ANAU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTOP | ANAU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.43 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 3.71 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.81 | 13.31 | -0.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTOP | ANAU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.53 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.45 | 1.60 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
QTOP vs. ANAU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTOP drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, roughly equal to the maximum ANAU.DE drawdown of -22.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOP and ANAU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTOP | ANAU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.28% | -22.35% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.88% | -10.88% | -2.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -0.77% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.81% | -2.96% | -0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 3.04% | +0.45% |
Volatility
QTOP vs. ANAU.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) has a higher volatility of 5.28% compared to AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE) at 4.75%. This indicates that QTOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANAU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTOP | ANAU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.28% | 4.75% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.45% | 11.91% | +1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.41% | 15.96% | +1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.68% | 18.40% | +4.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.68% | 18.40% | +4.28% |
QTOP vs. ANAU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTOP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ANAU.DE's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QTOP vs. ANAU.DE - Dividend Comparison
QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while ANAU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ANAU.DE AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTOP and ANAU.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ANAU.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANAU.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QTOP.
QTOP tracks Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index, while ANAU.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and AXA IM. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QTOP and 0.14% for ANAU.DE.
Find the right allocation for QTOP and ANAU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer