PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QTOP vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QTOP vs. ACWI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

QTOP (iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTOP is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QTOP returned 26.03% vs 23.78% for ACWI. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QTOP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.

Performance

QTOP vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTOP achieves a 12.29% return, which is significantly higher than ACWI's 11.28% return.

QTOP

1D
0.76%
1M
-3.71%
6M
10.80%
YTD
12.29%
1Y
26.03%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
23.79%

ACWI

1D
0.49%
1M
0.18%
6M
8.21%
YTD
11.28%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
12.53%
ALL TIME*
8.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

ACWI

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
$420.02M$465.87M$510.46M

QTOP

iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
$6.40M$5.80M$7.08M

QTOP vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF		12.29%22.19%6.25%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF		11.28%22.41%-0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between QTOP and ACWI is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2024

0.87

The correlation between QTOP and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

QTOP vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
QTOP
ACWI

Technology

67.0%
32.7%

Communication Services

15.2%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
4.7%

Healthcare

2.9%
8.3%

Basic Materials

1.5%
3.4%

Industrials

0.9%
10.8%

Energy

-

3.6%

Financial Services

-

16.0%

Real Estate

-

1.6%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Technology

QTOP
67.0%
ACWI
32.7%

Communication Services

QTOP
15.2%
ACWI
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

QTOP
9.1%
ACWI
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

QTOP
7.2%
ACWI
4.7%

Healthcare

QTOP
2.9%
ACWI
8.3%

Basic Materials

QTOP
1.5%
ACWI
3.4%

Industrials

QTOP
0.9%
ACWI
10.8%

Energy

QTOP

-

ACWI
3.6%

Financial Services

QTOP

-

ACWI
16.0%

Real Estate

QTOP

-

ACWI
1.6%

Utilities

QTOP

-

ACWI
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF

Often compared with QTOP:
QTOP vs. QQQQTOP vs. TOPTQTOP vs. QQQMQTOP vs. MAGSQTOP vs. QBIGQTOP vs. VGTQTOP vs. XLK
Often compared with ACWI:
ACWI vs. VTACWI vs. SPYACWI vs. VWRL.LACWI vs. ACWXACWI vs. VOOACWI vs. ACWI.LACWI vs. VTI

Return for Risk

QTOP vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
QTOP
QTOP Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
QTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
QTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QTOP vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

QTOPACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.09
1.59

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.58
2.23

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.29

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.29

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.58

9.58

-3.99

QTOP vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTOP Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTOP and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTOP vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTOP drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOP and ACWI.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QTOPACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.28%

-56.00%

+32.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.02%

-9.73%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-16.55%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-26.42%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-33.53%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.69%

-1.58%

-7.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.93%

-8.55%

+4.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

2.33%

+1.85%

Volatility

QTOP vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) has a higher volatility of 8.33% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 4.03%. This indicates that QTOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QTOPACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.33%

4.03%

+4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.01%

11.71%

+6.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.39%

14.01%

+7.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.79%

16.23%

+7.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.79%

17.06%

+6.73%

QTOP vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTOP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

QTOP vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than ACWI's 1.44% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF		1.44%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF		0.35%0.38%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

QTOP and ACWI have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTOP has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to ACWI (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTOP dropped -23.28% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 1-year performance, QTOP leads with 26.03% vs 23.78% for ACWI. On fees, QTOP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QTOP has performed better with a 26.03% return vs 23.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTOP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.35% for QTOP.

QTOP is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ACWI is Global Equities. QTOP tracks Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QTOP and 0.32% for ACWI.

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTOP and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer