QTOP vs. 5QQQ.L
QTOP (iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF) and 5QQQ.L (Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QTOP is passively managed, while 5QQQ.L is actively managed. Over the past year, QTOP returned 45.99% vs 227.72% for 5QQQ.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QTOP charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 5QQQ.L.
Performance
QTOP vs. 5QQQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QTOP is traded in USD, while 5QQQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 5QQQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTOP achieves a 22.71% return, which is significantly lower than 5QQQ.L's 98.30% return.
QTOP
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 10.74%
- YTD
- 22.71%
- 6M
- 21.95%
- 1Y
- 45.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
5QQQ.L
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 56.79%
- YTD
- 98.30%
- 6M
- 85.67%
- 1Y
- 227.72%
- 3Y*
- 79.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTOP vs. 5QQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 22.71% | 22.19% | 5.80% |
5QQQ.L Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities | 98.30% | 2.40% | 15.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTOP and 5QQQ.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024 | 0.65 |
The correlation between QTOP and 5QQQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
QTOP vs. 5QQQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTOP
5QQQ.L
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Industrials
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
QTOP
5QQQ.L
Communication Services
QTOP
5QQQ.L
Consumer Cyclical
QTOP
5QQQ.L
Consumer Defensive
QTOP
5QQQ.L
Healthcare
QTOP
5QQQ.L
Basic Materials
QTOP
5QQQ.L
Industrials
QTOP
5QQQ.L
Energy
QTOP
-
5QQQ.L
Financial Services
QTOP
-
5QQQ.L
Real Estate
QTOP
-
5QQQ.L
Utilities
QTOP
-
5QQQ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTOP vs. 5QQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
QTOP
5QQQ.L
QTOP vs. 5QQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (5QQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTOP | 5QQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.37 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.59 | 3.60 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.20 | 8.36 | +4.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTOP | 5QQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 2.52 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.48 | -0.03 | +1.51 |
Drawdowns
QTOP vs. 5QQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTOP drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, smaller than the maximum 5QQQ.L drawdown of -96.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOP and 5QQQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTOP | 5QQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.28% | -96.41% | +73.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.88% | -62.83% | +49.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -80.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -29.52% | +29.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -75.63% | +71.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 27.12% | -23.63% |
Volatility
QTOP vs. 5QQQ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) is 5.23%, while Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (5QQQ.L) has a volatility of 23.41%. This indicates that QTOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 5QQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTOP | 5QQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | 23.41% | -18.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.43% | 57.94% | -44.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.40% | 90.12% | -72.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.70% | 107.72% | -85.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.70% | 107.72% | -85.02% |
QTOP vs. 5QQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTOP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than 5QQQ.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTOP vs. 5QQQ.L - Dividend Comparison
QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while 5QQQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
5QQQ.L Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTOP and 5QQQ.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTOP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTOP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5QQQ.L.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QTOP and 0.75% for 5QQQ.L.
Find the right allocation for QTOP and 5QQQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer