PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5QQQ.L vs. 3XFE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

5QQQ.L vs. 3XFE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (5QQQ.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR (3XFE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

5QQQ.L vs. 3XFE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
5QQQ.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities
-33.28%-4.78%76.82%401.38%-95.59%15.05%
3XFE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR
-29.36%5.22%79.15%6.45%-39.90%3.65%
Different Trading Currencies

5QQQ.L is traded in GBp, while 3XFE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 3XFE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5QQQ.L achieves a -33.28% return, which is significantly lower than 3XFE.L's -29.36% return.


5QQQ.L

1D
15.91%
1M
-19.33%
YTD
-33.28%
6M
-33.86%
1Y
29.20%
3Y*
39.92%
5Y*
10Y*

3XFE.L

1D
5.15%
1M
-8.20%
YTD
-29.36%
6M
-27.01%
1Y
-24.97%
3Y*
23.43%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


5QQQ.L vs. 3XFE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 5QQQ.L and 3XFE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

5QQQ.L vs. 3XFE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5QQQ.L
5QQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
5QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5QQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
5QQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
5QQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
5QQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

3XFE.L
3XFE.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
3XFE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3XFE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
3XFE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
3XFE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
3XFE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5QQQ.L vs. 3XFE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (5QQQ.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR (3XFE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


5QQQ.L3XFE.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.28

-0.45

+0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.17

-0.34

+1.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.96

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

-0.67

+1.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.98

-1.84

+2.82

5QQQ.L vs. 3XFE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is higher than the 3XFE.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5QQQ.L and 3XFE.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


5QQQ.L3XFE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

-0.45

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

-0.05

-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between 5QQQ.L and 3XFE.L is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

5QQQ.L vs. 3XFE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 5QQQ.L nor 3XFE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

5QQQ.L vs. 3XFE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5QQQ.L drawdown since its inception was -95.97%, which is greater than 3XFE.L's maximum drawdown of -65.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5QQQ.L and 3XFE.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


5QQQ.L3XFE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.97%

-66.97%

-29.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.48%

-38.56%

-23.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.21%

-42.09%

-34.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.53%

-35.51%

-40.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.07%

14.32%

+11.75%

Volatility

5QQQ.L vs. 3XFE.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (5QQQ.L) has a higher volatility of 28.24% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR (3XFE.L) at 14.60%. This indicates that 5QQQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3XFE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


5QQQ.L3XFE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.24%

14.60%

+13.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.02%

31.83%

+39.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

105.51%

54.84%

+50.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

105.93%

54.32%

+51.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

105.93%

54.32%

+51.61%