PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EOCT vs. KBUF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EOCT vs. KBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT) and KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EOCT vs. KBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EOCT achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly higher than KBUF's -8.06% return.


EOCT

1D
1.81%
1M
-4.00%
YTD
0.91%
6M
2.77%
1Y
19.93%
3Y*
11.33%
5Y*
10Y*

KBUF

1D
1.24%
1M
-4.42%
YTD
-8.06%
6M
-12.68%
1Y
0.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EOCT vs. KBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EOCT has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than KBUF's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EOCT vs. KBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EOCT
EOCT Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
EOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

KBUF
KBUF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
KBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
KBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EOCT vs. KBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT) and KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EOCTKBUFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

0.02

+1.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.67

0.12

+2.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.01

+0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

-0.00

+3.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.67

-0.01

+12.68

EOCT vs. KBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EOCT Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the KBUF Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EOCT and KBUF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EOCTKBUFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

0.02

+1.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.83

-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between EOCT and KBUF is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EOCT vs. KBUF - Dividend Comparison

EOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.17%.


Drawdowns

EOCT vs. KBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EOCT drawdown since its inception was -20.35%, which is greater than KBUF's maximum drawdown of -14.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOCT and KBUF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EOCTKBUFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.35%

-14.55%

-5.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-14.55%

+7.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.23%

-13.49%

+9.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-3.37%

-2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

4.84%

-3.26%

Volatility

EOCT vs. KBUF - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT) and KraneShares 90% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2026 ETF (KBUF) have volatilities of 4.79% and 4.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EOCTKBUFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

4.63%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.68%

9.20%

-2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.48%

12.87%

-2.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.41%

14.08%

-2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.41%

14.08%

-2.67%