PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTJL vs. VABS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QTJL vs. VABS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) and Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QTJL vs. VABS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QTJL
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
-1.09%21.07%16.50%42.39%-30.16%9.32%
VABS
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF
0.70%5.40%7.59%7.61%-5.24%-0.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTJL achieves a -1.09% return, which is significantly lower than VABS's 0.70% return.


QTJL

1D
1.13%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
-1.09%
6M
1.75%
1Y
26.28%
3Y*
18.12%
5Y*
10Y*

VABS

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
0.70%
6M
1.62%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
6.26%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QTJL vs. VABS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VABS's 0.39% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QTJL vs. VABS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTJL
QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

VABS
VABS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
VABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VABS Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VABS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTJL vs. VABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) and Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTJLVABSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

2.03

-0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.85

2.80

-0.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.43

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

4.13

-2.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.86

10.78

+0.08

QTJL vs. VABS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTJL Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the VABS Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTJL and VABS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTJLVABSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

2.03

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

1.37

-0.93

Correlation

The correlation between QTJL and VABS is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QTJL vs. VABS - Dividend Comparison

QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%.


TTM20252024202320222021
QTJL
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VABS
Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF
5.21%4.94%5.05%4.13%2.47%1.47%

Drawdowns

QTJL vs. VABS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTJL drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, which is greater than VABS's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTJL and VABS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QTJLVABSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.40%

-7.12%

-26.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.42%

-1.05%

-14.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

-0.63%

-2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-1.46%

-6.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

0.40%

+2.13%

Volatility

QTJL vs. VABS - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS) at 0.61%. This indicates that QTJL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VABS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QTJLVABSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

0.61%

+5.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.61%

1.13%

+7.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.29%

2.22%

+21.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.75%

2.29%

+18.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.75%

2.27%

+18.48%