QTJL vs. NTSD
QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QTJL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
QTJL vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QTJL
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- 20.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTJL vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 7.93% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 17.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTJL and NTSD is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTJL vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
QTJL
NTSD
QTJL vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTJL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.23 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTJL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 5.08 | -4.56 |
Drawdowns
QTJL vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTJL drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTJL and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTJL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.40% | -5.20% | -28.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -1.11% | +1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.94% | -0.84% | -7.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.27% | — | — |
Volatility
QTJL vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTJL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.01% | 24.28% | -14.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 24.28% | -3.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 24.28% | -3.86% |
QTJL vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTJL vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither QTJL nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QTJL and NTSD have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTJL.
QTJL and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTJL and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for QTJL and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer