PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTJA vs. BUFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QTJA vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QTJA vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QTJA
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January
-3.69%18.86%18.47%25.56%-34.58%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
-0.54%11.02%12.05%16.51%-4.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTJA achieves a -3.69% return, which is significantly lower than BUFF's -0.54% return.


QTJA

1D
1.00%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
-3.69%
6M
-0.80%
1Y
21.22%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
10Y*

BUFF

1D
0.36%
1M
-1.47%
YTD
-0.54%
6M
1.29%
1Y
12.22%
3Y*
11.35%
5Y*
7.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QTJA vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTJA has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QTJA vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTJA
QTJA Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
QTJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTJA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QTJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTJA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTJA vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTJABUFFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.99

1.25

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.64

1.86

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

1.74

-0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.44

9.81

-1.38

QTJA vs. BUFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTJA Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the BUFF Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTJA and BUFF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTJABUFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

1.25

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.46

-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between QTJA and BUFF is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QTJA vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison

Neither QTJA nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QTJA
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%

Drawdowns

QTJA vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTJA drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTJA and BUFF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QTJABUFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.07%

-46.23%

+10.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.12%

-7.15%

-6.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-1.82%

-3.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.80%

-6.29%

-7.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

1.27%

+1.35%

Volatility

QTJA vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 2.63%. This indicates that QTJA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QTJABUFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

2.63%

+3.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.88%

4.06%

+4.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.47%

9.82%

+11.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.75%

8.40%

+12.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.75%

17.82%

+2.93%