QTJA vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

QTJA (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTJA is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. QTJA is actively managed, while BITI is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QTJA returned 16.58%/yr vs -31.71%/yr for BITI. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. QTJA charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

QTJA vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTJA achieves a 9.25% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 24.73% return.

QTJA

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -0.23%
• 6M: 8.36%
• YTD: 9.25%
• 1Y: 17.85%
• 3Y*: 16.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BITI

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -0.52%
• 6M: 36.51%
• YTD: 24.73%
• 1Y: 64.56%
• 3Y*: -31.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTJA vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QTJA Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January	9.25%	18.86%	18.47%	25.56%	-3.27%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	24.73%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-66.17%	3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between QTJA and BITI is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022	-0.37

Return for Risk

QTJA vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTJA

QTJA Risk / Return Rank: 64
QTJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
QTJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
QTJA Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QTJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
QTJA Martin Ratio Rank: 70

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 53
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTJA vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QTJA	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	1.47	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	2.04	+0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.25	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	2.57	-0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.44	6.36	+3.08

QTJA vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTJA Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTJA and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QTJA vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTJA drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTJA and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTJA	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.07%	-92.16%	+56.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.75%	-25.28%	+15.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.73%	-84.63%	+62.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.41%	-86.38%	+84.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.95%	-68.42%	+55.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	10.18%	-8.29%

Volatility

QTJA vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January (QTJA) is 2.97%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that QTJA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTJA	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	10.69%	-7.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.33%	34.09%	-23.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.21%	44.07%	-32.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.27%	52.21%	-31.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.27%	52.21%	-31.94%

QTJA vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTJA has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

QTJA vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

QTJA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.59%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.59%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%
QTJA Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTJA and BITI in my portfolio?

QTJA and BITI have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QTJA or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to QTJA (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTJA dropped -36.07% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, QTJA or BITI?

On 3-year performance, QTJA leads with 16.58% vs -31.71% for BITI. On fees, QTJA is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJA has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QTJA or BITI?

Over the 3-year period, QTJA has performed better with a 16.58% return vs -31.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QTJA or BITI?

QTJA is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QTJA or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.59%, compared with 0.00% for QTJA.

What is the main difference between QTJA and BITI?

QTJA is categorized as Options Trading, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTJA and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTJA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.