PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTELX vs. QMHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTELX vs. QMHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund (QTELX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTELX achieves a 29.67% return, which is significantly higher than QMHIX's 19.09% return. Over the past 10 years, QTELX has outperformed QMHIX with an annualized return of 10.80%, while QMHIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.86% annualized return.


QTELX

1D
-0.76%
1M
6.23%
YTD
29.67%
6M
33.01%
1Y
56.12%
3Y*
28.03%
5Y*
9.14%
10Y*
10.80%

QMHIX

1D
1.12%
1M
2.36%
YTD
19.09%
6M
22.29%
1Y
35.13%
3Y*
16.80%
5Y*
16.50%
10Y*
5.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTELX vs. QMHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QTELX
AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund
29.67%32.89%11.82%12.66%-21.29%0.92%16.90%14.27%-16.22%37.15%
QMHIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund
19.09%19.97%10.78%-0.17%50.14%-2.08%-0.73%1.82%-14.44%-1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between QTELX and QMHIX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.02

Over the past year, QTELX and QMHIX have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTELX vs. QMHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTELX
QTELX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QTELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTELX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
QTELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTELX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

QMHIX
QMHIX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QMHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QMHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTELX vs. QMHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund (QTELX) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTELXQMHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.48

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.34

7.40

-3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.05

21.80

-4.75

QTELX vs. QMHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTELX Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is comparable to the QMHIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTELX and QMHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTELXQMHIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25

2.81

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.96

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.38

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.39

+0.22

Drawdowns

QTELX vs. QMHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTELX drawdown since its inception was -40.55%, roughly equal to the maximum QMHIX drawdown of -39.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTELX and QMHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTELXQMHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.55%

-39.37%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.38%

-4.83%

-8.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.94%

-19.06%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.37%

-19.06%

-18.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.55%

-34.54%

-6.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

0.00%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.44%

-17.81%

+5.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

1.63%

+1.77%

Volatility

QTELX vs. QMHIX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund (QTELX) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX) at 3.80%. This indicates that QTELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTELXQMHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.79%

3.80%

+3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.31%

9.70%

+5.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

12.75%

+5.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

17.36%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.87%

15.51%

+2.36%

QTELX vs. QMHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTELX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than QMHIX's 1.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTELX vs. QMHIX - Dividend Comparison

QTELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than QMHIX's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QMHIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund
1.72%2.05%2.31%7.66%9.34%10.96%9.52%4.18%0.00%0.00%0.01%7.57%
QTELX
AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund
3.25%4.21%4.84%5.65%4.60%2.42%1.53%2.32%2.32%1.55%2.51%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTELX and QMHIX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTELX has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to QMHIX (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTELX dropped -40.55% vs QMHIX's -39.37%.

QTELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTELX and QMHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer