PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTELX vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTELX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund (QTELX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTELX achieves a 29.67% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 6.78% return. Over the past 10 years, QTELX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 10.80%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.74% annualized return.


QTELX

1D
-0.76%
1M
6.23%
YTD
29.67%
6M
33.01%
1Y
56.12%
3Y*
28.03%
5Y*
9.14%
10Y*
10.80%

SCHG

1D
0.35%
1M
4.73%
YTD
6.78%
6M
6.01%
1Y
24.63%
3Y*
25.14%
5Y*
15.67%
10Y*
18.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTELX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QTELX
AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund
29.67%32.89%11.82%12.66%-21.29%0.92%16.90%14.27%-16.22%37.15%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
6.78%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between QTELX and SCHG is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.63

The correlation between QTELX and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTELX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTELX
QTELX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QTELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTELX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
QTELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTELX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTELX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund (QTELX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTELXSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.28

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.34

1.51

+2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.05

5.04

+12.01

QTELX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTELX Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTELX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTELXSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25

1.60

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.71

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.87

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.85

-0.24

Drawdowns

QTELX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTELX drawdown since its inception was -40.55%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTELX and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTELXSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.55%

-34.59%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.38%

-16.41%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.94%

-23.39%

+6.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.37%

-34.59%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.55%

-34.59%

-5.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-1.44%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.44%

-5.20%

-7.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

4.90%

-1.50%

Volatility

QTELX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund (QTELX) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 3.61%. This indicates that QTELX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTELXSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.79%

3.61%

+4.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.31%

11.62%

+3.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

15.49%

+2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

22.26%

-5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.87%

21.55%

-3.68%

QTELX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTELX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTELX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

QTELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QTELX
AQR Emerging Multi-Style II Fund
3.25%4.21%4.84%5.65%4.60%2.42%1.53%2.32%2.32%1.55%2.51%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTELX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTELX has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to SCHG (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTELX dropped -40.55% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

QTELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTELX and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer