PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTEC vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTEC vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTEC achieves a 44.73% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.


QTEC

1D
0.07%
1M
22.39%
YTD
44.73%
6M
40.31%
1Y
67.84%
3Y*
32.86%
5Y*
17.61%
10Y*
23.00%

OILK

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
64.22%
6M
60.70%
1Y
58.99%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTEC vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
44.73%22.28%7.32%67.02%-39.83%26.89%38.76%48.22%-4.62%37.78%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
64.22%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%63.71%-61.09%30.48%-20.40%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between QTEC and OILK is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016

0.13

The correlation between QTEC and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QTEC vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QTEC
OILK

Technology

87.9%

-

Communication Services

6.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
100.0%

Industrials

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

QTEC
87.9%
OILK

-

Communication Services

QTEC
6.2%
OILK

-

Consumer Cyclical

QTEC
4.0%
OILK
100.0%

Industrials

QTEC
1.9%
OILK

-

Basic Materials

QTEC

-

OILK

-

Consumer Defensive

QTEC

-

OILK

-

Energy

QTEC

-

OILK

-

Financial Services

QTEC

-

OILK

-

Healthcare

QTEC

-

OILK

-

Real Estate

QTEC

-

OILK

-

Utilities

QTEC

-

OILK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTEC vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTEC
QTEC Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
QTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTEC vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTECOILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.34

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

3.42

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.77

6.91

+6.86

QTEC vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is higher than the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTEC and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTECOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97

2.06

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.59

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.12

+0.49

Drawdowns

QTEC vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTEC drawdown since its inception was -58.86%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTEC and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTECOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.86%

-83.76%

+24.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.03%

-17.35%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.00%

-23.42%

-5.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.54%

-34.69%

-10.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.66%

+3.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.89%

-32.61%

+22.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.94%

8.56%

-3.62%

Volatility

QTEC vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) is 7.34%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that QTEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTECOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.34%

10.44%

-3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.26%

23.26%

-5.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.98%

28.75%

-5.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.19%

30.12%

-0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.51%

35.97%

-8.46%

QTEC vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTEC has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTEC vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

QTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.18%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%0.00%0.00%
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.02%0.14%0.15%0.02%0.44%0.68%0.91%0.80%1.29%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTEC and OILK have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to QTEC (7.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTEC dropped -58.86% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 17.61% for QTEC. On fees, QTEC is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QTEC has been the lower-risk option at 7.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 17.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTEC is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.00% for QTEC.

QTEC is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while OILK is Oil & Gas. QTEC tracks NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for QTEC and 0.68% for OILK.

QTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTEC and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer