QTEC vs. NFTY
QTEC (First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund) and NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTEC is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index, while NFTY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QTEC returned 23.50%/yr vs 8.70%/yr for NFTY. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QTEC charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFTY.
Performance
QTEC vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTEC achieves a 40.25% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -6.80% return. Over the past 10 years, QTEC has outperformed NFTY with an annualized return of 23.50%, while NFTY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
QTEC
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 40.25%
- 6M
- 37.40%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 31.63%
- 5Y*
- 15.73%
- 10Y*
- 23.50%
NFTY
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- -6.80%
- 6M
- -6.38%
- 1Y
- -7.03%
- 3Y*
- 6.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.83%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
QTEC vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund | 40.25% | 22.28% | 7.32% | 67.02% | -39.83% | 26.89% | 38.76% | 48.22% | -4.62% | 37.78% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | -6.80% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 24.00% | -3.46% | 26.83% | 10.04% | 0.58% | -1.51% | 21.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTEC and NFTY is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2012 | 0.30 |
QTEC vs. NFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTEC
NFTY
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
QTEC
NFTY
Communication Services
QTEC
NFTY
Consumer Cyclical
QTEC
NFTY
Industrials
QTEC
NFTY
Basic Materials
QTEC
-
NFTY
Consumer Defensive
QTEC
-
NFTY
Energy
QTEC
-
NFTY
Financial Services
QTEC
-
NFTY
Healthcare
QTEC
-
NFTY
Real Estate
QTEC
-
NFTY
-
Utilities
QTEC
-
NFTY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTEC vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank
QTEC
NFTY
QTEC vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QTEC | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.93 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | -0.44 | +3.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.49 | -1.07 | +11.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QTEC vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTEC drawdown since its inception was -58.86%, which is greater than NFTY's maximum drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTEC and NFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTEC | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.86% | -47.67% | -11.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.03% | -16.14% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.00% | -21.55% | -7.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.54% | -21.55% | -23.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.54% | -47.67% | +2.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.83% | -14.80% | +10.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.87% | -9.61% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | 6.60% | -1.50% |
Volatility
QTEC vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) has a higher volatility of 14.21% compared to First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) at 4.34%. This indicates that QTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTEC | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.21% | 4.34% | +9.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.98% | 12.64% | +9.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.11% | 14.75% | +11.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.73% | 17.41% | +12.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.75% | 20.71% | +7.04% |
QTEC vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTEC has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTEC vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison
QTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than NFTY's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | 1.90% | 1.24% | 1.61% | 0.13% | 5.89% | 1.53% | 0.61% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 4.10% | 3.28% | 4.39% |
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.14% | 0.15% | 0.02% | 0.44% | 0.68% | 0.91% | 0.80% | 1.29% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTEC and NFTY have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTEC has higher volatility (14.21%) compared to NFTY (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTEC dropped -58.86% vs NFTY's -47.67%.
On 10-year performance, QTEC leads with 23.50% vs 8.70% for NFTY. On fees, QTEC is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, NFTY has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QTEC has performed better with a 23.50% return vs 8.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTEC is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFTY.
NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.01% for QTEC.
QTEC is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. QTEC tracks NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index, while NFTY tracks NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for QTEC and 0.80% for NFTY.
QTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTEC and NFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer