QTEC vs. FBCGX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX).

QTEC is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index. It was launched on Apr 19, 2006. FBCGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 25, 2017.

Performance

QTEC vs. FBCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QTEC vs. FBCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund	-4.83%	22.28%	7.32%	67.02%	-39.83%	26.89%	38.76%	48.22%	-4.62%	11.93%
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund	-6.85%	21.33%	38.15%	55.57%	-37.84%	23.00%	62.92%	36.11%	-2.33%	14.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTEC achieves a -4.83% return, which is significantly higher than FBCGX's -6.85% return.

QTEC

• 1D: 1.44%
• 1M: -2.41%
• YTD: -4.83%
• 6M: -5.34%
• 1Y: 25.47%
• 3Y*: 18.89%
• 5Y*: 8.19%
• 10Y*: 18.13%

FBCGX

• 1D: 4.62%
• 1M: -5.07%
• YTD: -6.85%
• 6M: -4.17%
• 1Y: 28.16%
• 3Y*: 26.56%
• 5Y*: 12.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTEC vs. FBCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTEC has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FBCGX's 0.45% expense ratio.

QTEC

First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund

FBCGX

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund

Return for Risk

QTEC vs. FBCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTEC

QTEC Risk / Return Rank: 51
QTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
QTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
QTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 49
QTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 50

FBCGX

FBCGX Risk / Return Rank: 72
FBCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FBCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FBCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FBCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FBCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTEC vs. FBCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QTEC	FBCGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	1.19	-0.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	1.81	-0.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.26	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	1.94	-0.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.03	7.40	-2.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QTEC vs. FBCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTEC Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the FBCGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTEC and FBCGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QTEC	FBCGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87	1.19	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.49	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.76	-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between QTEC and FBCGX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

QTEC vs. FBCGX - Dividend Comparison

QTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	0.14%	0.15%	0.02%	0.44%	0.68%	0.91%	0.80%	1.29%	0.99%
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund	1.04%	0.97%	0.62%	0.26%	0.12%	6.71%	1.26%	0.28%	0.46%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QTEC vs. FBCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTEC drawdown since its inception was -58.86%, which is greater than FBCGX's maximum drawdown of -42.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTEC and FBCGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTEC	FBCGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.86%	-42.55%	-16.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.03%	-13.28%	-2.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.54%	-42.55%	-2.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.14%	-8.61%	-2.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.96%	-9.04%	-0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.22%	3.47%	+1.75%

Volatility

QTEC vs. FBCGX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) has a higher volatility of 8.48% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) at 7.92%. This indicates that QTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTEC	FBCGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.48%	7.92%	+0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.22%	14.30%	+3.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.51%	25.02%	+4.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.04%	25.03%	+4.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.35%	25.00%	+2.35%