PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTAP vs. VFMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QTAP vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QTAP vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QTAP
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April
3.02%19.36%17.34%43.32%-25.87%15.63%
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
2.90%10.52%16.91%8.86%-5.73%14.38%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QTAP having a 3.02% return and VFMV slightly lower at 2.90%.


QTAP

1D
1.74%
1M
1.79%
YTD
3.02%
6M
5.43%
1Y
21.08%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
10Y*

VFMV

1D
0.35%
1M
-4.26%
YTD
2.90%
6M
3.50%
1Y
7.75%
3Y*
12.83%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QTAP vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QTAP vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTAP
QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VFMV
VFMV Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
VFMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMV Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTAP vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTAPVFMVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.29

0.63

+0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.05

0.94

+1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.13

+0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

0.80

+1.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.95

3.69

+9.26

QTAP vs. VFMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTAP Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the VFMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTAP and VFMV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTAPVFMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

0.63

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.66

-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between QTAP and VFMV is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QTAP vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison

QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QTAP
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
2.04%2.12%1.46%2.20%2.08%1.31%2.14%2.43%2.29%

Drawdowns

QTAP vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTAP drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, smaller than the maximum VFMV drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAP and VFMV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QTAPVFMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.44%

-33.64%

+4.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.04%

-9.63%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.26%

+4.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.21%

-3.69%

-1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.09%

-0.41%

Volatility

QTAP vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) is 1.88%, while Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that QTAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QTAPVFMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.88%

3.43%

-1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.23%

6.62%

-3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.38%

12.28%

+4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.03%

11.77%

+7.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.03%

14.34%

+4.69%