QTAP vs. NTSD
QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QTAP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
QTAP vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QTAP
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 14.67%
- 6M
- 15.56%
- 1Y
- 25.59%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 12.94% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 17.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTAP and NTSD is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTAP vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
QTAP
NTSD
QTAP vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTAP | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 80.04 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTAP | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 5.08 | -4.33 |
Drawdowns
QTAP vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTAP drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAP and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTAP | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.44% | -5.20% | -24.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -1.11% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -0.84% | -4.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.32% | — | — |
Volatility
QTAP vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTAP | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.56% | 24.28% | -18.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 24.28% | -5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 24.28% | -5.51% |
QTAP vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTAP vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither QTAP nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QTAP and NTSD have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTAP.
QTAP and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTAP and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for QTAP and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer