QTAP vs. NFLU

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) and NFLU (T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QTAP returned 21.61% vs -67.52% for NFLU. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QTAP charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NFLU.

Performance

QTAP vs. NFLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTAP achieves a 15.59% return, which is significantly higher than NFLU's -46.53% return.

QTAP

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 1.24%
• 6M: 15.02%
• YTD: 15.59%
• 1Y: 21.61%
• 3Y*: 20.08%
• 5Y*: 12.49%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.79%

NFLU

• 1D: 1.91%
• 1M: -6.80%
• 6M: -25.69%
• YTD: -46.53%
• 1Y: -67.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -17.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF	$3.25M	$4.92M	$4.50M
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	$241.79K	$219.11K	$201.05K

QTAP vs. NFLU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	15.59%	19.36%	4.50%
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF	-46.53%	-12.47%	50.22%

Correlation

The correlation between QTAP and NFLU is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024	0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between QTAP and NFLU has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

QTAP vs. NFLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 97

NFLU

NFLU Risk / Return Rank: 1
NFLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
NFLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NFLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
NFLU Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QTAP vs. NFLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QTAP	NFLU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.29	-0.97	+4.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.33	-1.66	+6.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.78	0.79	+0.99
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.72	-0.88	+8.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	37.02	-1.37	+38.38

QTAP vs. NFLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTAP Sharpe Ratio is 3.29, which is higher than the NFLU Sharpe Ratio of -0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTAP and NFLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QTAP vs. NFLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTAP drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, smaller than the maximum NFLU drawdown of -80.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAP and NFLU.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTAP	NFLU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.44%	-80.45%	+51.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.81%	-77.14%	+74.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-76.66%	+76.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.90%	-32.29%	+27.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.59%	49.46%	-48.87%

Volatility

QTAP vs. NFLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) is 2.79%, while T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) has a volatility of 21.59%. This indicates that QTAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTAP	NFLU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.79%	21.59%	-18.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.78%	55.76%	-49.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.60%	69.97%	-63.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.94%	69.51%	-50.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.55%	69.51%	-50.96%

QTAP vs. NFLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than NFLU's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

QTAP vs. NFLU - Dividend Comparison

Neither QTAP nor NFLU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTAP and NFLU in my portfolio?

QTAP and NFLU have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QTAP or NFLU?

NFLU has higher volatility (21.59%) compared to QTAP (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTAP dropped -29.44% vs NFLU's -80.45%.

Which ETF is better, QTAP or NFLU?

On 1-year performance, QTAP leads with 21.61% vs -67.52% for NFLU. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QTAP or NFLU?

Over the 1-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 21.61% return vs -67.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QTAP or NFLU?

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QTAP or NFLU?

QTAP and NFLU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QTAP and NFLU?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTAP and 1.05% for NFLU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.