QTAP vs. LOUP
QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) and LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTAP is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. QTAP is actively managed, while LOUP is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QTAP returned 13.78%/yr vs 12.98%/yr for LOUP. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QTAP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LOUP.
Performance
QTAP vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTAP achieves a 14.67% return, which is significantly lower than LOUP's 28.21% return.
QTAP
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 14.67%
- 6M
- 15.56%
- 1Y
- 25.59%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- —
LOUP
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- 18.57%
- YTD
- 28.21%
- 6M
- 26.83%
- 1Y
- 75.49%
- 3Y*
- 37.37%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 14.67% | 19.36% | 17.34% | 43.32% | -25.87% | 15.63% |
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 28.21% | 43.24% | 21.80% | 51.31% | -46.00% | -3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTAP and LOUP is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021 | 0.78 |
The correlation between QTAP and LOUP shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QTAP vs. LOUP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTAP
LOUP
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QTAP
LOUP
Communication Services
QTAP
LOUP
Consumer Cyclical
QTAP
LOUP
Consumer Defensive
QTAP
LOUP
-
Healthcare
QTAP
LOUP
Industrials
QTAP
LOUP
Utilities
QTAP
LOUP
Basic Materials
QTAP
LOUP
-
Energy
QTAP
LOUP
Financial Services
QTAP
LOUP
Real Estate
QTAP
LOUP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTAP vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank
QTAP
LOUP
QTAP vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTAP | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.23 | 1.41 | +0.82 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.20 | 3.61 | +11.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 80.04 | 12.23 | +67.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTAP | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.62 | 2.66 | +1.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.40 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.59 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
QTAP vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTAP drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAP and LOUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTAP | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.44% | -58.68% | +29.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.69% | -21.00% | +19.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.03% | -35.23% | +22.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | -55.63% | +26.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -1.87% | +1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -20.04% | +15.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.32% | 6.19% | -5.87% |
Volatility
QTAP vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) is 1.33%, while Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a volatility of 8.23%. This indicates that QTAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTAP | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.33% | 8.23% | -6.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.97% | 21.94% | -17.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.56% | 28.51% | -22.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 32.38% | -13.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 31.96% | -13.19% |
QTAP vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTAP vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison
Neither QTAP nor LOUP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QTAP and LOUP have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LOUP has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to QTAP (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTAP dropped -29.44% vs LOUP's -58.68%.
On 5-year performance, QTAP leads with 13.78% vs 12.98% for LOUP. On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 13.78% return vs 12.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTAP.
QTAP and LOUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
QTAP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while LOUP is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTAP and 0.70% for LOUP.
QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTAP and LOUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer