LITX vs. MULL
LITX (Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LITX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.
Performance
LITX vs. MULL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LITX
- 1D
- -8.16%
- 1M
- -34.75%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULL
- 1D
- -8.87%
- 1M
- -18.69%
- 6M
- 358.48%
- YTD
- 555.59%
- 1Y
- 2,617.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LITX vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF | 184.89% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 268.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between LITX and MULL is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LITX vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank
LITX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MULL
LITX vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LITX | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.63 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 49.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 156.39 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LITX vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LITX drawdown since its inception was -62.15%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITX and MULL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LITX | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.15% | -72.29% | +10.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.76% | -45.21% | -9.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.94% | -20.84% | -0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.40% | — |
Volatility
LITX vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LITX | MULL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 67.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 124.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 193.93% | 152.52% | +41.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 193.93% | 144.81% | +49.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 193.93% | 144.81% | +49.12% |
LITX vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison
LITX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LITX vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison
LITX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF | 0.06% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LITX and MULL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LITX is cheaper at 1.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LITX is cheaper with a 1.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.
MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for LITX.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for LITX and 1.50% for MULL.
Find the right allocation for LITX and MULL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer