QTAP vs. DUOG
QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) and DUOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long DUOL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.00 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. QTAP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DUOG.
Performance
QTAP vs. DUOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTAP achieves a 15.59% return, which is significantly higher than DUOG's -55.92% return.
QTAP
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 15.02%
- YTD
- 15.59%
- 1Y
- 21.61%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.49%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.79%
DUOG
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- -55.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $402.79K | $350.33K | $687.09K | |
| $241.79K | $219.11K | $201.05K |
QTAP vs. DUOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 15.59% | 0.45% |
DUOG Leverage Shares 2X Long DUOL Daily ETF | -55.92% | -25.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTAP and DUOG is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTAP vs. DUOG — Risk / Return Rank
QTAP
DUOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTAP vs. DUOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long DUOL Daily ETF (DUOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QTAP | DUOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.78 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.72 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.02 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QTAP vs. DUOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTAP drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, smaller than the maximum DUOG drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAP and DUOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTAP | DUOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.44% | -83.13% | +53.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -66.98% | +66.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.90% | -65.01% | +60.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | — | — |
Volatility
QTAP vs. DUOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTAP | DUOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.78% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.60% | 116.50% | -109.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 116.50% | -97.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 116.50% | -97.95% |
QTAP vs. DUOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DUOG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTAP vs. DUOG - Dividend Comparison
Neither QTAP nor DUOG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QTAP and DUOG have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DUOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DUOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTAP.
QTAP and DUOG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTAP and 0.75% for DUOG.
Find the right allocation for QTAP and DUOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer